Geographical Requirements for the Applicability of the Results of the RACECAT Study to Other Stroke Networks

Author:

Schuler Florian A. F.1ORCID,Ribó Marc2ORCID,Dequatre‐Ponchelle Nelly3,Rémi Jan4,Dobrocky Tomas5ORCID,Goeldlin Martina B.1ORCID,Gralla Jan5ORCID,Kaesmacher Johannes5ORCID,Meinel Thomas R.1ORCID,Mordasini Pasquale56,Seiffge David J.1ORCID,Fischer Urs17ORCID,Arnold Marcel1ORCID,Kägi Georg18ORCID,Jung Simon1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Switzerland

2. Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain

3. LilNCog—Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM, U1172 Lille France

4. Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany

5. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland

6. Network Radiology Kantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland

7. Department of Neurology University Hospital Basel, University of Basel Switzerland

8. Department of Neurology Kantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland

Abstract

Background The RACECAT (Transfer to the Closest Local Stroke Center vs Direct Transfer to Endovascular Stroke Center of Acute Stroke Patients With Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion in the Catalan Territory) trial was the first randomized trial addressing the prehospital triage of acute stroke patients based on the distribution of thrombolysis centers and intervention centers in Catalonia, Spain. The study compared the drip‐and‐ship with the mothership paradigm in regions where a local thrombolysis center can be reached faster than the nearest intervention center (equipoise region). The present study aims to determine the population‐based applicability of the results of the RACECAT study to 4 stroke networks with a different degree of clustering of the intervention centers (clustered, dispersed). Methods and Results Stroke networks were compared with regard to transport time saved for thrombolysis (under the drip‐and‐ship approach) and transport time saved for endovascular therapy (under the mothership approach). Population‐based transport times were modeled with a local instance of an openrouteservice server using open data from OpenStreetMap.The fraction of the population in the equipoise region differed substantially between clustered networks (Catalonia, 63.4%; France North, 87.7%) and dispersed networks (Southwest Bavaria, 40.1%; Switzerland, 40.0%). Transport time savings for thrombolysis under the drip‐and‐ship approach were more marked in clustered networks (Catalonia, 29 minutes; France North, 27 minutes) than in dispersed networks (Southwest Bavaria and Switzerland, both 18 minutes). Conclusions Infrastructure differences between stroke networks may hamper the applicability of the results of the RACECAT study to other stroke networks with a different distribution of intervention centers. Stroke networks should assess the population densities and hospital type/distribution in the temporal domain before applying prehospital triage algorithms to their specific setting.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3