Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Author:

Barone Gibbs Bethany12ORCID,Muldoon Matthew F.3ORCID,Conroy Molly B.4,Paley Joshua L.2ORCID,Shimbo Daichi5ORCID,Perera Subashan6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA

2. Departments of Health and Human Development, School of Education University of Pittsburgh PA USA

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA

5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY USA

6. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA

Abstract

Background There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. Methods and Results This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh‐worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within‐person BP variability explained ( R 2 ) by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5‐minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, P <0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, P <0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed: 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings ( P <0.05). Conclusions Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Whelton PK;Circulation,2018

2. Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

3. Ambulatory blood pressure variability

4. Short-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure measurements: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 observational studies

5. Reproducibility of intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mean‐ing Beyond Office Blood Pressure;Journal of the American Heart Association;2023-12-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3