Transcatheter Ductal Stents Versus Surgical Systemic‐Pulmonary Artery Shunts in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease With Ductal‐Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: Trends and Associated Outcomes From the Pediatric Health Information System Database

Author:

Valencia Eleonore1ORCID,Staffa Steven J.2ORCID,Kuntz Michael T.3ORCID,Zaleski Katherine L.2,Kaza Aditya K.4ORCID,Maschietto Nicola1ORCID,Nasr Viviane G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston MA

3. Department of Anesthesiology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston MA

Abstract

Background Surgical systemic‐to‐pulmonary artery shunts have been the standard approach to establish stable pulmonary blood flow in neonates with congenital heart disease with ductal‐dependent pulmonary blood flow. More recently, transcatheter ductal stents have been performed as an alternative, less invasive intervention. We aimed to characterize trends in the utilization of surgical shunts versus ductal stents and compare associated outcomes. Methods and Results Using data from the Pediatric Health Information System, we retrospectively analyzed neonates with congenital heart disease with ductal‐dependent pulmonary blood flow who underwent surgical shunt or ductal stent placement between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) diagnosis and procedure codes. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were reintervention risk and adjusted hospital costs. Of 936 patients included, 65.2% underwent a surgical shunt over the 6‐year period. The proportion who underwent ductal stenting increased from 19% to 53.4% from 2016 to 2021. The median adjusted difference in postintervention length of hospital stay was 11 days greater for the surgical shunt cohort (95% CI, 7.2–14.8; P <0.001). The adjusted reintervention risks within 3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.37 [95% CI, 1.91–5.95], P <0.001) and 6 months (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.62–3.64], P <0.001) were significantly greater in the ductal stent group. Median adjusted index hospital costs were $198 300 ($11 6400–$340 000) versus $120 400 ($81 800–$192 400) for the surgical shunt and ductal stent cohorts, respectively ( P <0.001). Conclusions Ductal stenting has become an increasingly utilized palliative approach to secure pulmonary blood flow in neonates with congenital heart disease with ductal‐dependent pulmonary blood flow in the United States. Ductal stenting is associated with decreased length of hospital stay and reduced overall cost for the index hospitalization but with a greater reintervention risk than surgical shunting.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3