Tmax Mismatch Ratio to Identify Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis‐Related Large‐Vessel Occlusion Before Endovascular Therapy

Author:

Yoshimoto Takeshi1ORCID,Inoue Manabu2ORCID,Tanaka Kanta2ORCID,Koge Junpei2ORCID,Shiozawa Masayuki2ORCID,Kamogawa Naruhiko2ORCID,Ishiyama Hiroyuki1,Abe Soichiro1,Imamura Hirotoshi3ORCID,Kataoka Hiroharu3ORCID,Koga Masatoshi2ORCID,Ihara Masafumi1ORCID,Toyoda Kazunori2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

2. Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

3. Department of Neurosurgery National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

Abstract

Background We aimed to clarify which time‐to‐maximum of the tissue residue function (Tmax) mismatch ratio is useful in predicting anterior intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)–related large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) before endovascular therapy. Methods and Results Patients with ischemic stroke who underwent perfusion‐weighted imaging before endovascular therapy for anterior intracranial LVO were divided into those with ICAS‐related LVO and those with embolic LVO. Tmax ratios of >10 s/>8 s, >10 s/>6 s, >10 s/>4 s, >8 s/>6 s, >8 s/>4 s, and >6 s/>4 s were considered Tmax mismatch ratios. Binominal logistic regression was used to identify ICAS‐related LVO, and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI for each Tmax mismatch ratio increase of 0.1 were calculated. A similar analysis was performed for ICAS‐related LVO with and without embolic sources, using embolic LVO as the reference. Of 213 patients (90 women [42.0%]; median age, 79 years), 39 (18.3%) had ICAS‐related LVO. The aOR (95% CI) per 0.1 increase in Tmax mismatch ratio in ICAS‐related LVO with embolic LVO as reference was lowest with Tmax mismatch ratio >10 s/>6 s (0.56 [0.43–0.73]). Multinomial logistic regression analysis also showed the lowest aOR (95% CI) per 0.1 increase in Tmax mismatch ratio with Tmax >10 s/>6 s (ICAS‐related LVO without embolic source: 0.60 [0.42–0.85]; ICAS‐related LVO with embolic source: 0.55 [0.38–0.79]). Conclusions A Tmax mismatch ratio of >10 s/>6 s was the optimal predictor of ICAS‐related LVO compared with other Tmax profiles, with or without an embolic source before endovascular therapy. Registration clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier NCT02251665.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3