Impact of New‐Onset Right Bundle‐Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

Author:

Kikuchi Shinnosuke1ORCID,Minamimoto Yugo1ORCID,Matsushita Kensuke1ORCID,Cho Tomoki2,Terasaka Kengo1ORCID,Hanajima Yohei1ORCID,Nakahashi Hidefumi1ORCID,Gohbara Masaomi1,Kimura Yuichiro1,Yasuda Shota2ORCID,Okada Kozo1ORCID,Matsuzawa Yasushi1ORCID,Iwahashi Noriaki1,Kosuge Masami1ORCID,Ebina Toshiaki1ORCID,Morel Olivier3ORCID,Ohlmann Patrick3ORCID,Uchida Keiji2ORCID,Hibi Kiyoshi14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan

2. Cardiovascular Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan

3. Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d’Activité Médico‐Chirurgicale Cardio‐Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Strasbourg France

4. Department of Cardiology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan

Abstract

Background A delayed and recurrent complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a life‐threatening complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Post‐TAVR evaluation may be important in predicting delayed and recurrent CAVB requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). The impact of new‐onset right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) after TAVR on PPI remains unknown. Methods and Results In total, 407 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR were included in this analysis. Intraprocedural CAVB was defined as CAVB that occurred during TAVR. A 12‐lead ECG was evaluated at baseline, immediately after TAVR, on postoperative days 1 and 5, and according to the need to identify new‐onset bundle‐branch block (BBB) and CAVB after TAVR. Forty patients (9.8%) required PPI, 17 patients (4.2%) had persistent intraprocedural CAVB, and 23 (5.7%) had delayed or recurrent CAVB after TAVR. The rates of no new‐onset BBB, new‐onset left BBB, and new‐onset RBBB were 65.1%, 26.8%, and 4.7%, respectively. Compared with patients without new‐onset BBB and those with new‐onset left BBB, the rate of PPI was higher in patients with new‐onset RBBB (3.4% versus 5.6% versus 44.4%, P <0.0001). On post‐TAVR evaluation in patients without persistent intraprocedural CAVB, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that new‐onset RBBB was a statistically significant predictor of PPI compared with no new‐onset BBB (odds ratio [OR], 18.0 [95% CI, 5.94–54.4]) in addition to the use of a self‐expanding valve (OR, 2.97 [95% CI, 1.09–8.10]). Conclusions Patients with new‐onset RBBB after TAVR are at high risk for PPI.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3