Process Evaluation of a Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra‐Low‐Dose Treatment for Hypertension Within a Federally Qualified Health Center Network (QUARTET USA)

Author:

Sanuade Olutobi A.1ORCID,Jacobson Tyler A.2ORCID,Quintana Adriana3ORCID,Flowers Fallon M.3,Abbasi Hiba3,Vu My H.2ORCID,Baldridge Abigail S.2ORCID,Mejia Jairo3ORCID,Lazar Danielle3ORCID,Ciolino Jody D.2ORCID,Huffman Mark D.245ORCID,Kandula Namratha R.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah Salt Lake City UT

2. Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL

3. Access Community Health Network Chicago IL

4. Cardiovascular Division and Global Health Center Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO

5. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia

Abstract

Background This convergent parallel‐design mixed‐methods process evaluation of the QUARTET USA (Quadruple Ultra‐Low‐Dose Treatment for Hypertension USA) clinical trial (NCT03640312) explores patient and health care professional perceptions about the use of low‐dose quadruple therapy (LDQT) as a novel strategy for hypertension management. Methods and Results A survey of all 62 patients enrolled in the QUARTET USA trial was conducted. A subsample of 13 patients and 11 health care professionals, recruited via purposive sampling, took part in semistructured interviews. At enrollment, 68% of participants (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [11.5] years; 56% self‐identified as Hispanic: Mexican ethnicity, 16% as Hispanic: other ethnicity, 16% as Black race, 8% as White race, and 1.6% as South Asian race) reported that their current health depended on blood pressure medications, and 48% were concerned about blood pressure medications. At trial completion, 80% were satisfied with LDQT, 96% were certain the benefits of taking LDQT outweighed the disadvantages, and 96% reported that LDQT was convenient to take. Both patients and health care professionals found LDQT acceptable because it reduced patients' perceived pill burden and facilitated medication adherence. Health care professionals stated that a perceived limitation of LDQT was the inability to titrate doses. Steps to facilitate LDQT implementation include introducing stepped‐care combinations and treatment protocols, inclusion in clinical practice guidelines, and eliminating patient cost barriers. Conclusions LDQT was an acceptable strategy for hypertension treatment among patients and health care professionals involved in the QUARTET USA clinical trial. Although LDQT was generally perceived as beneficial for maintaining patients' blood pressure control and facilitating adherence, some clinicians perceived limitations in titration inflexibility, adverse effects, and costs. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03640312.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3