Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Author:
Ringelstein E. Bernd1, Thijs Vincent1, Norrving Bo1, Chamorro Angel1, Aichner Franz1, Grond Martin1, Saver Jeff1, Laage Rico1, Schneider Armin1, Rathgeb Frank1, Vogt Gerhard1, Charissé Gabriele1, Fiebach Jochen B.1, Schwab Stefan1, Schäbitz Wolf R.1, Kollmar Rainer1, Fisher Marc1, Brozman Miroslav1, Skoloudik David1, Gruber Franz1, Leal Joaquin Serena1, Veltkamp Roland1, Köhrmann Martin1, Berrouschot Jörg1, Egerer Gerlinde, Mikus Gerd, Limmroth Volker, Kieser Meinhard, Bracoud Luc, Fiebach Jochen B., Hermier Marc, Bouffard Juliette, Weber Rüdiger, , , , , ,
Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (E.B.R.); Department of Neurology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (V.T.); Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium (V.T.); Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Department of Neurology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (A.C.); Department of Neurology, Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg, Linz, Austria (F.A.); Department of Neurology, Kreiskrankenhaus Siegen,...
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
Granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (G-CSF; AX200; Filgrastim) is a stroke drug candidate with excellent preclinical evidence for efficacy. A previous phase IIa dose–escalation study suggested potential efficacy in humans. The present large phase IIb trial was powered to detect clinical efficacy in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Methods—
G-CSF (135 µg/kg body weight intravenous over 72 hours) was tested against placebo in 328 patients in a multinational, multicenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial (NCT00927836;
www.clinicaltrial.gov
). Main inclusion criteria were ≤9-hour time window after stroke onset, infarct localization in the middle cerebral artery territory, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score range of 6 to 22, and baseline diffusion-weighted imaging lesion size ≥15 mL. Primary and secondary end points were the modified Rankin scale score and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at day 90, respectively. Data were analyzed using a prespecified model that adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, and initial infarct volume (diffusion-weighted imaging).
Results—
G-CSF treatment failed to meet the primary and secondary end points of the trial. For additional end points such as mortality, Barthel index, or infarct size at day 30, G-CSF did not show efficacy either. There was, however, a trend for reduced infarct growth in the G-CSF group. G-CSF showed the expected peripheral pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, with a strong increase in leukocytes and monocytes. In parallel, the cytokine profile showed a significant decrease of interleukin-1.
Conclusions—
G-CSF, a novel and promising drug candidate with a comprehensive preclinical and clinical package, did not provide any significant benefit with respect to either clinical outcome or imaging biomarkers.
Clinical Trial Registration—
URL:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier: NCT00927836.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology
Cited by
120 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|