Radial Artery Catheterization for Neuroendovascular Procedures

Author:

Khanna Omaditya1,Sweid Ahmad1,Mouchtouris Nikolaos1,Shivashankar Kavya1,Xu Vivan1,Velagapudi Lohit1,Stricsek Geoffrey1,Amllay Abdelaziz1,Texakalidis Pavlos1,Gooch M. Reid1,Tjoumakaris Stavropoula1,Rosenwasser Robert H.1,Jabbour Pascal M.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, PA.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Radial artery catheterization is an alternate route of access that has started to gain more widespread use for neuroendovascular procedures, and there have been few studies that describe its safety and efficacy. We present our institution’s experience in performing neuroendovascular interventions via a transradial approach, with excellent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction measures. Methods— We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 223 patients who underwent 233 consecutive neuroendovascular interventions via radial artery access at our institution. The incidence of perioperative and postprocedural complications was investigated. We identified a subset of 98 patients who have undergone both transradial and transfemoral cerebral angiograms and compared clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction measures between the 2 groups. Results— The overall incidence of complications was low across all procedures performed via transradial access. Peri-procedurally, only 2 patients had symptomatic radial artery spasm, and there were no instances of iatrogenic complications (vessel dissection, stroke, and hemorrhage). In 10 cases (4.3%), the intended procedure could not be completed via a transradial approach, and, thus, femoral artery access had to be pursued instead. Ten patients complained of minor postprocedural complications, although none required therapeutic intervention. The mean procedure time was shorter for diagnostic angiograms performed via transradial versus transfemoral access (18.8±15.8 versus 39.5±31.1 minutes; P =0.025). Patients overall reported shorter recovery times with transradial access, and the majority of patients (94%) would elect to have subsequent procedures performed via this route. Conclusions— Radial artery catheterization is a safe and durable alternative to perform a wide range of neuroendovascular procedures, with a low rate of complications. On the whole, patients prefer transradial compared with transfemoral access.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference11 articles.

1. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial

2. Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes.;Snelling BM;J Neurointerv Surg,2018

3. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: Comparison of technical and clinical outcomes [published online January 22, 2019].;Chen SH;J Neurointerv Surg

4. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review.;Tavakol M;Glob J Health Sci,2012

5. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3