Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.
Abstract
All prior drug development programs of neuroprotective agents were unsuccessful for a variety of reasons related to both preclinical assessment and the design/implementation of clinical trials. The neuroprotection hypothesis of improving functional outcome related to salvaging ischemic brain tissue is strongly supported by robust preclinical data for many agents. In the future, monotherapy neuroprotection trials will be difficult but could be performed in underused centers with drugs that have very promising and complete preclinical results. Additional approaches for the testing and use of neuroprotective agents should be considered. Novel approaches would include extending penumbral survival for the later use of reperfusion therapy, reducing reperfusion injury after successful reperfusion, and using drugs with both neuroprotective and recovery enhancing effects, as exemplified by granulocyte colony–stimulating factor and citicoline. To maximize outcome after stroke, the combined use or reperfusion and neuroprotection is likely to be needed, so we must begin to perform carefully designed trials with this combination.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Cited by
142 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献