Impact of Shunting Practice Patterns During Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Author:

Squizzato Francesco12ORCID,Siracuse Jeffrey J.3,Shuja Fahad1,Colglazier Jill1ORCID,Balachandran Wilkins Parvathi1ORCID,Goodney Philip P.4,Sands Brooke Benjamin5ORCID,DeMartino Randall R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (F. Squizzato, F. Shuja, J.C., P.B.W., R.R.D.).

2. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Italy (F. Squizzato).

3. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, MA (J.J.S.).

4. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, PA (P.P.G.).

5. Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (B.S.B.).

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the effect of surgeons’ shunting practice and shunt use on the early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a multicenter national prospective database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010–2019) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days after an ipsilateral stroke or transient ischemic attack. Surgeons were gauged as routine shunters if they shunted in >95% of CEAs, otherwise were classified as selective shunters. In-hospital stroke and death rates were compared between routine and selective shunters, stratifying by type of index event (transient ischemic attack versus stroke) and timing of CEA (≤2 versus >2 days). Results: Thirteen thousand four hundred sixty-nine CEAs were performed after a transient ischemic attack (43%) or stroke (57%), 3186 (24%) by routine shunters, and 10 283 (76%) by selective shunters. Comparing routine and selective shunters, in-hospital stroke (1.9% versus 2.4%; P =0.09) and death (0.4% versus 0.5%; P =0.73) rates were similar. A lower stroke rate (1.5% versus 4.2%; P =0.02) was achieved by routine shunters for CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, a higher stroke rate occurred in case of shunt use (2.9% versus 2.3%; P <0.01), mainly due to cases presenting with stroke (3.5% versus 2.4%; P <0.01) but not transient ischemic attack (1.8% versus 1.5%; P =0.57). Awake anesthesia was adopted in 7.8% of cases by selective shunters and in 0.8% by routine shunters, without impact on the perioperative stroke rate (1.8% versus 2.3%; P =0.349). Conclusions: In this large national cohort, the overall outcomes of CEA were similar between routine and selective shunters. A lower postoperative stroke rate was achieved by routine shunters in CEA performed <2 days after an ischemic stroke. Among selective shunters, intraoperatively indicated shunting determined an increased stroke rate, likely due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. These data may guide the decision regarding timing of CEA and shunting intention in symptomatic patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference22 articles.

1. Risks and benefits of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. The International Transcranial Doppler Collaborators.

2. Editor's Choice – Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)

3. Bond, R, Rerkasem, K, Rothwell, PM. Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting). The Cochrane Collaboration, ed. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002:CD000190. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD000190

4. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

5. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3