How to Establish the Outer Limits of Reperfusion Therapy

Author:

Wechsler Lawrence R.1ORCID,Jadhav Ashutosh P.2,Jovin Tudor G.3,Adeoye Opeolu,Albers Greg,Ansari Saeed,Boltze Johannes,Buchan Alastair,Campbell Bruce C.V.,Chaisinanunkul Napasri,Chen Christopher,Derdeyn Colin P.,Haddad Walid,Hill Michael D.,Holt William,Houser Gary,Khatri Pooja,Krtolica Ana,Landen Jaren W.,Lansberg Maarten G.,Liebeskind David S.,Lyden Patrick,Lynch John,Meinzer Caitlyn,Mistry Eva A.,Mocco J.,Nogueira Raul G.,Saver Jeffrey L.,Savitz Sean I.,Schwamm Lee H.,Sheth Kevin N.,Snyder Meredith,Solberg Yoram,Vagal Achala,Venkatasubramanian Chitra,Warach Steven,Ziogas Nikolaos K.,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (L.R.W.).

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ (A.P.J.).

3. Department of Neurology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ (T.G.J.).

Abstract

Reperfusion therapy with intravenous alteplase and endovascular therapy are effective treatments for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke. Guidelines for treatment are based upon randomized trials demonstrating substantial treatment effects for highly selected patients based on time from stroke onset and imaging features. However, patients beyond the current established guidelines might benefit with lesser but still clinically significant treatment effects. The STAIR (Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable) XI meeting convened a workgroup to consider the “outer limits” of reperfusion therapy by defining the current boundaries, and exploring optimal parameters and methodology for determining the outer limits. In addition to statistical significance, the minimum clinically important difference should be considered in exploring the limits of reperfusion therapy. Societal factors and quality of life considerations should be incorporated into assessment of treatment efficacy. The threshold for perception of benefit in the medical community may differ from that necessary for the Food and Drug Administration approval. Data from alternative sources such as platform trials, registries and large pragmatic trials should supplement randomized controlled trials to improve generalizability to routine clinical practice. Further interactions between industry and academic centers should be encouraged.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3