Number of Cerebral Microbleeds and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Thrombolysis

Author:

Dannenberg Steffen1,Scheitz Jan F.1,Rozanski Michal1,Erdur Hebun1,Brunecker Peter1,Werring David J.1,Fiebach Jochen B.1,Nolte Christian H.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (S.D., J.F.S., M.R., H.E., C.H.N.), Center for Stroke Research (J.F.S., M.R., P.B., J.B.F., C.H.N.), and Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (J.F.S.), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom (D.J.W.); and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom (D.J.W.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are found in a substantial proportion of patients with ischemic stroke eligible for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Until now, there is limited data on the impact of multiple CMBs on occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. Methods— Between 2008 and 2013, all patients receiving MRI-based intravenous thrombolysis were identified within our prospective thrombolysis register. Number of CMBs was rated on pretreatment T2*-weighted MRI by a rater blinded to clinical data and follow-up. Outcomes of interest were occurrence of symptomatic ICH (sICH) and parenchymal hemorrhage (PH). Results— Among 326 included patients, 52 patients had a single CMB (16.0%), 19 had 2 to 4 CMBs (5.8%), and 10 had ≥5 CMBs (3.1%). Frequency of sICH/PH was 1.2%/5.7% in patients without CMBs, 3.8%/3.8% in patients with a single CMB, 10.5%/21.1% in patients with 2 to 4 CMBs, and 30.0%/30.0% in patients with ≥5 CMBs, respectively (each P for trend <0.01). The unadjusted odds ratio per additional CMB for sICH was 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.33; P <0.01) and for PH was 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.24; P =0.01). Compared with patients without CMBs, both patients with 2 to 4 CMBs ( P =0.02/ P =0.02) and patients with ≥5 CMBs ( P <0.01/ P <0.01) had significantly increased odds ratios for sICH and PH, whereas in patients with a single CMB, odds ratios were not significantly increased ( P =0.21/ P =0.59). The association of CMB burden with sICH/PH remained significant after adjustment for possible confounders (age, age-related white matter changes score, atrial fibrillation, onset-to-treatment time, prior statin use, and systolic blood pressure on admission). Conclusions— Our findings indicate a higher risk of sICH and PH after intravenous thrombolysis when multiple CMBs are present, with a graded relationship to increasing baseline CMB number.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3