Clinical, Neuroimaging, and Genetic Markers in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Inflammation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Theodorou Aikaterini1ORCID,Palaiodimou Lina1ORCID,Malhotra Konark2ORCID,Zompola Christina1ORCID,Katsanos Aristeidis H.3ORCID,Shoamanesh Ashkan3ORCID,Boviatsis Efstathios4ORCID,Dardiotis Efthimios5ORCID,Spilioti Martha6ORCID,Sacco Simona7ORCID,Werring David J.8ORCID,Cordonnier Charlotte9ORCID,Alexandrov Andrei V.10ORCID,Paraskevas George P.1ORCID,Tsivgoulis Georgios110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Second Department of Neurology (A.T., L.P., C.Z., G.P.P., G.T.), National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Greece.

2. Department of Neurology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.).

3. Division of Neurology, McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada (A.H.K., A.S.).

4. Department of Neurosurgery (E.B.), National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Greece.

5. Neurology Department, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Greece (E.D.).

6. First Department of Neurology, AHEPA General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (M.S.).

7. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, via Vetoio, Italy (S.S.).

8. Stroke Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom (D.J.W.).

9. University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172, LilNCog, Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, France (C.C.).

10. Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis (A.V.A., G.T.).

Abstract

Background: There are limited data regarding the prevalence of distinct clinical, neuroimaging and genetic markers among patients diagnosed with cerebral amyloid angiopathy–related inflammation (CAA-ri). We sought to determine the prevalence of clinical, radiological, genetic and cerebrospinal fluid biomarker findings in patients with CAA-ri. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies including patients with CAA-ri was conducted to determine the prevalence of clinical, neuroimaging, genetic and cerebrospinal fluid biomarker findings. Subgroup analyses were performed based on (1) prospective or retrospective study design and (2) CAA-ri diagnosis with or without available biopsy. We pooled the prevalence rates using random-effects models and assessed the heterogeneity using Cochran-Q and I 2 -statistics. Results: We identified 4 prospective and 17 retrospective cohort studies comprising 378 patients with CAA-ri (mean age, 71.5 years; women, 52%). The pooled prevalence rates were as follows: cognitive decline at presentation 70% ([95% CI, 54%–84%]; I 2 =82%), focal neurological deficits 55% ([95% CI, 40%–70%]; I 2 =82%), encephalopathy 54% ([95% CI, 39%–68%]; I 2 =43%), seizures 37% ([95% CI, 27%–49%]; I 2 =65%), headache 31% ([95% CI, 22%–42%]; I 2 =58%), T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense white matter lesions 98% ([95% CI, 93%–100%]; I 2 =44%), lobar cerebral microbleeds 96% ([95% CI, 92%–99%]; I 2 =25%), gadolinium enhancing lesions 54% ([95% CI, 42%–66%]; I 2 =62%), cortical superficial siderosis 51% ([95% CI, 34%–68%]; I 2 =77%) and lobar macrohemorrhage 40% ([95% CI, 11%–73%]; I 2 =88%). The prevalence rate of the ApoE (Apolipoprotein E) ε4/ε4 genotype was 34% ([95% CI, 17%–53%]; I 2 =76%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated no differences in these prevalence rates based on study design and diagnostic strategy. Conclusions: Cognitive decline was the most common clinical feature. Hyperintense T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery white matter lesions and lobar cerebral microbleeds were by far the most prevalent neuroimaging findings. Thirty-four percent of patients with CAA-ri have homozygous ApoE ε4/ε4 genotype and scarce data exist regarding the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and its significance in these patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3