Efficacy of Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomographic Perfusion–Selected Patients in SWIFT PRIME Trial (Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke)

Author:

Menjot de Champfleur Nicolas1,Saver Jeffrey L.1,Goyal Mayank1,Jahan Reza1,Diener Hans-Christoph1,Bonafe Alain1,Levy Elad I.1,Pereira Vitor M.1,Cognard Christophe1,Yavagal Dileep R.1,Albers Gregory W.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Stanford Stroke Center, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (G.W.A.); Department of Radiology (M.G.) and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (M.G.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Interventional Neuroradiology (R.J.) and Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine (J.L.S.), University of California Los Angeles; Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac,...

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The majority of patients enrolled in SWIFT PRIME trial (Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke) had computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) imaging before randomization; 34 patients were randomized after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods— Patients with middle cerebral artery and distal carotid occlusions were randomized to treatment with tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) alone or tPA+stentriever thrombectomy. The primary outcome was the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Patients with the target mismatch profile for enrollment were identified on MRI and CTP. Results— MRI selection was performed in 34 patients; CTP in 139 patients. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 in both groups. Target mismatch profile was present in 95% (MRI) versus 83% (CTP). A higher percentage of the MRI group was transferred from an outside hospital ( P =0.02), and therefore, the time from stroke onset to randomization was longer in the MRI group ( P =0.003). Time from emergency room arrival to randomization did not differ in CTP versus MRI-selected patients. Baseline ischemic core volumes were similar in both groups. Reperfusion rates (>90%/TICI [Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction] score 3) did not differ in the stentriever-treated patients in the MRI versus CTP groups. The primary efficacy analysis (90-day mRS score) demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in both subgroups (MRI, P =0.02; CTP, P =0.01). Infarct growth was reduced in the stentriever-treated group in both MRI and CTP groups. Conclusions— Time to randomization was significantly longer in MRI-selected patients; however, site arrival to randomization times were not prolonged, and the benefits of endovascular therapy were similar. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01657461.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3