Left Ventricular Dilatation Increases the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Reduced Systolic Function

Author:

Aleong Ryan G.1,Mulvahill Matthew J.1,Halder Indrani2,Carlson Nichole E.1,Singh Madhurmeet2,Bloom Heather L.3,Dudley Samuel C.4,Ellinor Patrick T.5,Shalaby Alaa26,Weiss Raul7,Gutmann Rebecca8,Sauer William H.1,Narayanan Kumar9,Chugh Sumeet S.9,Saba Samir2,London Barry8

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado, Denver, CO

2. University of Pittsburgh, PA

3. Emory University and Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA

4. Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute and the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI

5. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

6. Pittsburgh VA Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA

7. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

8. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

9. Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Background Reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias; however, LV ejection fraction has a low sensitivity to predict ventricular arrhythmias. LV dilatation and mass may be useful to further risk‐stratify for ventricular arrhythmias. Methods and Results Patients from the Genetic Risk of Assessment of Defibrillator Events ( GRADE ) study (N=930), a study of heart failure subjects with defibrillators, were assessed for appropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator shock and death, heart transplant, or ventricular assist device placement by LV diameter and mass. LV mass was divided into normal, mild, moderate, and severe classifications. Severe LV end‐diastolic diameter had worse shock‐free survival than normal and mild LV end‐diastolic diameter ( P =0.0002 and 0.0063, respectively; 2‐year shock free, severe 74%, moderate 80%, mild 91%, normal 88%; 4‐year shock free, severe 62%, moderate 69%, mild 72%, normal 81%) and freedom from death, transplant, or ventricular assist device compared with normal and moderate LV end‐diastolic diameter ( P <0.0001 and 0.0441, respectively; 2‐year survival: severe 78%, moderate 85%, mild 82%, normal 89%; 4‐year survival: severe 55%, moderate 64%, mild 63%, normal 74%). Severe LV mass had worse shock‐free survival than normal and mild LV mass ( P =0.0370 and 0.0280, respectively; 2‐year shock free: severe 80%, moderate 81%, mild 91%, normal 87%; 4‐year shock free: severe 68%, moderate 73%, mild 76%, normal 76%) but no association with death, transplant, or ventricular assist device ( P =0.1319). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for LV ejection fraction, LV end‐diastolic diameter was associated with appropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator shocks (hazard ratio 1.22, P =0.020). LV end‐diastolic diameter was associated with time to death, transplant, or ventricular assist device (hazard ratio 1.29, P =0.0009). Conclusions LV dilatation may complement ejection fraction to predict ventricular arrhythmias. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02045043.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3