Affiliation:
1. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Abstract
Background
We sought to analyze the impact of socioeconomic status (
SES
) on in‐hospital outcomes, cost of hospitalization, and resource use after acute ischemic stroke.
Methods and Results
We used the 2003–2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for this analysis. All admissions with a principal diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes.
SES
was assessed by using median household income of the residential
ZIP
code for each patient. Quartile 1 and quartile 4 reflect the lowest‐income and highest‐income
SES
quartile, respectively. During a 9‐year period, 775 905 discharges with acute ischemic stroke were analyzed. There was a progressive increase in the incidence of reperfusion on the first admission day across the
SES
quartiles (P‐trend<0.001). In addition, we observed a significant reduction in discharge to nursing facility, across the
SES
quartiles (P‐trend<0.001). Although we did not observe a significant difference in in‐hospital mortality across the
SES
quartiles in the overall cohort (P‐trend=0.22), there was a significant trend toward reduced in‐hospital mortality across the
SES
quartiles in younger patients (<75 years) (P‐trend<0.001). The mean length of stay in the lowest‐income quartile was 5.75 days, which was significantly higher compared with other
SES
quartiles. Furthermore, the mean adjusted cost of hospitalization among quartiles 2, 3, and 4, compared with quartile 1, was significantly higher by $621, $1238, and $2577, respectively. Compared with the lowest‐income quartile, there was a significantly higher use of echocardiography, invasive angiography, and operative procedures, including carotid endarterectomy, in the highest‐income quartile.
Conclusions
Patients from lower‐income quartiles had decreased reperfusion on the first admission day, compared with patients from higher‐income quartiles. The cost of hospitalization of patients from higher‐income quartiles was significantly higher than that of patients from lowest‐income quartiles, despite longer hospital stays in the latter group. This might be partially attributable to a lower use of key procedures among patients from lowest‐income quartile.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine