Diagnosis of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

Author:

Greenberg Steven M.1,Vonsattel Jean-Paul G.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Neurology (S.M.G.) and C.S. Kubik Laboratory for Neuropathology (J-P.G.V.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brain Tissue Resource Center, McLean Hospital (J-P.G.V.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Examination of cortical tissue obtained surgically is an important tool for diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) during life. Analysis of a single sample of cortical tissue, however, might lead to conclusions that are either falsely positive (because of the high frequency of CAA in the healthy elderly) or falsely negative (because of the patchy distribution of CAA pathology). We therefore attempted to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of cortical biopsy for diagnosis of CAA as the cause of intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods To simulate biopsy in CAA, we took biopsy-sized cortical samples from postmortem brains with known extents of CAA: either CAA-related hemorrhage or mild to severe CAA without hemorrhage. Samples were stained with the use of methods routinely available in surgical pathology laboratories and blindly examined for vascular amyloid and amyloid-related vasculopathic changes. Results The presence of vascular amyloid was a sensitive marker for CAA-related hemorrhage, occurring in all 28 specimens from brains with hemorrhage. Conversely, the appearance of fibrinoid necrosis in amyloid-laden vessels was relatively specific for CAA-related hemorrhage. This finding occurred in 13 of the 28 specimens (46%) from brains with hemorrhage but in none of 27 sections from brains with mild CAA and in only 4 of 42 specimens with moderate to severe CAA without hemorrhage. Conclusions These data help to define criteria for the diagnosis of CAA-related hemorrhage from surgical specimens.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 248 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3