Vasopressin Combined With Epinephrine Decreases Cerebral Perfusion Compared With Vasopressin Alone During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pigs

Author:

Wenzel Volker1,Lindner Karl H.1,Augenstein Sven1,Prengel Andreas W.1,Strohmenger Hans U.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany (V.W., K.H.L., S.A., A.W.P., H.U.S.); the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, Austria (V.W., K.H.L., S.A., H.U.S.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Knappschaft Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany (A.W.P.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose —It is unknown whether a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine may be superior to vasopressin alone by targeting both nonadrenergic and adrenergic receptors. Methods —After 15 minutes of cardiac arrest (13 minutes of ventricular fibrillation and 2 minutes of pulseless electrical activity) and 3 minutes of chest compressions, 16 animals were randomly treated with either 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (n=8) or 0.8 U/kg vasopressin combined with 200 μg/kg epinephrine (n=8). Results —Comparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine at 90 seconds and 5 minutes after drug administration resulted in comparable mean (±SEM) coronary perfusion pressure (54±3 versus 57±5 and 36±4 versus 35±4 mm Hg, respectively), cerebral perfusion pressure (59±6 versus 65±8 and 40±6 versus 39±6 mm Hg, respectively), and median (25th to 75th percentiles) left ventricular myocardial blood flow [116 (81 to 143) versus 108 (97 to 125) and 44 (35 to 81) versus 62 (42 to 74) mL · min −1 · 100 g −1 , respectively], but significantly increased ( P <0.05) total cerebral blood flow [81 (77 to 95) versus 39 (34 to 58) and 50 (43 to 52) versus 28 (16 to 35) mL · min −1 · 100 g −1 , respectively]. Return of spontaneous circulation rates in both groups were comparable (vasopressin, 7 of 8; vasopressin and epinephrine, 6 of 8). Conclusions —Comparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in comparable left ventricular myocardial blood flow but significantly increased cerebral perfusion.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3