Relationships Between Cerebral Regional Blood Flow Velocities and Volumetric Blood Flows and Their Respective Reactivities to Acetazolamide

Author:

Démolis Pierre1,Dinh Yves R. Tran1,Giudicelli Jean-François1

Affiliation:

1. the Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre (P.D., J.-F. G.), and Explorations Fonctionnelles du Système Nerveux, IFR “Circulation Lariboisière,” Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris (Y.R.T.D.), France.

Abstract

Background and Purpose The technique of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) is widely used for assessment of cerebral blood flow velocity. Whether measurement of changes in TCD velocity can be used for studying volumetric cerebral blood flow variations remains a matter of debate. We therefore investigated the relationship between flow velocity and volumetric cerebral blood flow before and during acetazolamide-induced vasodilation. Methods The middle cerebral artery mean blood flow velocity (MV) measured by TCD and the corresponding regional and hemispheric cerebral blood flows assessed with 133 Xe single-photon emission CT were measured in 52 unselected patients. Absolute values of flow and velocity before and after stimulation and their reactivity to acetazolamide were compared. When the correlation was statistically significant, the linearity of the relationship was tested. Results Absolute values of hemispheric cerebral blood flow were correlated with MV both before ( r =.315, P =.02) and after acetazolamide ( r =.436, P =.001), whereas regional cerebral blood flow was correlated with MV only after acetazolamide (before, r =.262, P =.06; after, r =.446, P =.001). All these relationships fitted a linear model. In contrast, there was no correlation between acetazolamide-induced relative increments of flow and velocity. Conclusions Our results support a linear model describing the relationship between absolute values of flow and velocity when arterial section is the slope and anastomotic blood flow is the intercept. In contrast, relative increments in volumetric flow and velocity may be proportional only if anastomotic flow is negligible, ie, in subjects without cerebrovascular disease. We conclude that, for patients with cerebrovascular disease, TCD does not satisfactorily model cerebral vasoreactivity in terms of volumetric cerebral blood flow.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3