Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Cardiology, International St. Mary’s Hospital, Incheon, Korea (S.-Y.L.); Department of Cardiology, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea (S.-H.H.); Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea (S.-G.L.); Department of Cardiology, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (S.-W.K.); Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea (D.-H.S., J.-S.K., B.-K.K., Y.-G.K.,...
Abstract
Background—
Despite the enhanced properties of the second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), its association with neoatherosclerosis has not been sufficiently evaluated. Therefore, we sought to evaluate and compare neoatherosclerosis in second-generation DESs to first-generation DESs.
Methods and Results—
A total of 212 DES-treated patients with >50% percent neointimal cross-sectional area stenosis were retrospectively enrolled from the Korean multicenter optical coherence tomography (OCT) registry. Within this population, 111 patients had a second-generation DES (40 zotarolimus, 36 everolimus, and 35 biolimus) and 101 patients had a first-generation (65 sirolimus and 36 paclitaxel) DES. Neoatherosclerosis on OCT was defined as neointima formation with the presence of lipids or calcification. OCT-determined neoatherosclerosis was identified in 27.4% (58/212) of all DES-treated lesions. The frequency of neoatherosclerosis increased with the stent age. Stent age was shorter in the second-generation DES group (12.4 months versus 55.4 months,
P
<0.001), and neoatherosclerosis was less frequently observed in that group (10.8% versus 45.5%,
P
<0.001). However, after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 4.113; 95% confidence interval, 1.086–15.575;
P
=0.037), >70 mg/dL of low-density cholesterol at follow-up OCT (odds ratio, 2.532; 95% confidence interval, 1.054–6.084;
P
=0.038), and stent age (odds ratio, 1.710; 95% confidence interval, 1.403–2.084;
P
<0.001) were all independent predictors for neoatherosclerosis, whereas the type of DES (first- versus second-generation) was not. Patients with neoatherosclerosis showed a higher rate of acute coronary syndrome at follow-up OCT (19.0% versus 3.9%, respectively,
P
=0.001).
Conclusions—
The second-generation DES is not more protective against neoatherosclerosis compared with the first-generation DES.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献