Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis

Author:

Alfonso Fernando1,Pérez-Vizcayno María José1,García del Blanco, Bruno1,García-Touchard, Arturo1,López-Mínguez, José-Ramón1,Masotti, Mónica1,Zueco, Javier1,Melgares, Rafael1,Mainar, Vicente1,Moreno, Raul1,Domínguez, Antonio1,Sanchís, Juan1,Bethencourt, Armando1,Moreu, José1,Cequier, Angel1,Martí, Vicens1,Otaegui, Imanol1,Bastante, Teresa1,Gonzalo, Nieves1,Jiménez-Quevedo, Pilar1,Cárdenas, Alberto1,Fernández, Cristina1

Affiliation:

1. From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital...

Abstract

Background— Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is more challenging than that of patients with bare-metal stent ISR. However, the results of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in these distinct scenarios remain unsettled. Methods and Results— A pooled analysis of the RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) and RIBS V (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data to compare the efficacy of EES in bare-metal stent ISR and DES-ISR. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. Results of 94 patients treated with EES for bare-metal stent ISR were compared with those of 155 patients treated with EES for DES-ISR. Baseline characteristics were more adverse in patients with DES-ISR, although they presented later and more frequently with a focal pattern. After intervention, minimal lumen diameter (2.22±0.5 versus 2.38±0.5 mm, P =0.01) was smaller in the DES-ISR group. Late angiographic findings (89.3% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (2.03±0.7 versus 2.36±0.6 mm, P <0.001) and diameter stenosis (23±22 versus 13±17%, P <0.001) were poorer in patients with DES-ISR. Results were consistent in the in-segment and in-lesion analyses. On multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR. Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), mortality (2.6 versus 0%, P <0.01) and need for target vessel revascularization (8 versus 2%, P =0.03) were higher in the DES-ISR group. Conclusions— This patient-level pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized clinical trials suggests that EES provide favorable outcomes in patients with ISR. However, the results of EES are less satisfactory in patients with DES-ISR than in those with bare-metal stent ISR. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01239953 and NCT01239940.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Drug-Eluting Coronary-Artery Stents

2. Spanish Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention Registry. 24th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology (1990–2014).;García Del Blanco B;Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed),2015

3. In-Stent Restenosis in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era

4. Current Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

5. Outcome Differences With the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis of Bare-Metal Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Stents

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3