Differences Between Patients With Intermittent Claudication and Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Intervention: Insights From the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease Registry

Author:

Patel Kunal12ORCID,Liu Yulun1,Etaee Farshid3ORCID,Patel Chirag24,Monteleone Peter5,Patel Mitul6,Amer Alaiti Mohamad12,Metzger Christopher7,Banerjee Avantika8,Minniefield Nicole12,Tejani Ishita12,Brilakis Emmanouil S.9ORCID,Shishehbor Mehdi H.10ORCID,Banerjee Subhash12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (K.P., Y.L., M.A.A., N.M., I.T., S.B.).

2. Veterans Affairs North Texas System, Dallas (K.P., C.P., M.A.A., N.M., I.T., S.B.).

3. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo School of Medicine (F.E.).

4. Methodist Health System Dallas, TX (C.P.).

5. University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School (P.M.).

6. University of California San Diego Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, La Jolla (M.P.).

7. Ballad Health/Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.).

8. Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (A.B.).

9. Minneapolis Heart Institute, MN (E.S.B.).

10. Case Western Reserve University and Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH (M.H.S.).

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on differences in angiographic distribution of peripheral artery disease and endovascular revascularization strategies in patients presenting with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischemia (CLI). We aimed to compare anatomic features, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes between patients with IC and CLI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Methods: We examined 3326 patients enrolled in the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease registry from 2006 to 2019 who were referred for endovascular intervention for IC (n=1983) or CLI (n=1343). The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse limb events, which included death, repeat target limb revascularization, or target limb amputation. Results: Patients with CLI were older and more likely to have diabetes and chronic kidney disease and less likely to receive optimal medical therapy compared with IC. Patients with IC had higher femoropopliteal artery interventions (IC 87% versus CLI 65%; P <0.001), while below the knee interventions were more frequent in CLI (CLI 47% versus IC 12%; P <0.001). Patients with CLI were more likely to have multilevel peripheral artery disease (CLI 32% versus IC 15%, P <0.001). Patients with IC were predominantly revascularized with stents (IC 48% versus CLI 37%; P <0.001) while balloon angioplasty was more frequent in CLI (CLI 37% versus IC 25%; P <0.001). All-cause mortality was higher in patients with CLI (CLI 4% versus IC 2%; P =0.014). Major adverse limb event rates for patients with IC and CLI were 16% and 26%, respectively ( P <0.001) and remained higher in CLI after multivariable adjustment of baseline risk factors. Conclusions: Patients with IC and CLI have significant anatomic, lesion, and treatment differences with significantly higher mortality and adverse limb outcomes in CLI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01904851. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3