Postocclusional Hyperemia for Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Author:

Kawase Yoshiaki1,Omori Hiroyuki1,Kawasaki Masanori1,Tanigaki Toru1,Hirata Tetsuo1,Okamoto Syuuichi1,Ota Hideaki1,Kikuchi Jun1,Okubo Munenori1,Kamiya Hiroki1,Hirakawa Akihiro1,Suzuki Takahiko1,Matsuo Hitoshi1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Japan (Y.K., H.O., T.T., T.H., S.O., H.O., J.K., M.O., H.K., T.S., H.M.); Department of Cardiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (M.K.); and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan (A.H.).

Abstract

Background— Postocclusional hyperemia caused by balloon occlusion is a potential alternative method of inducing hyperemia for measuring post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve (FFR). The aim of this study was to investigate postocclusional hyperemia as a method of inducing hyperemia. Methods and Results— FFR measured by postocclusional hyperemia (FFRoccl) caused by balloon occlusion after percutaneous coronary intervention was compared with FFR measured by drug-induced hyperemia (FFR measured by intravenous ATP; and FFR measured by intracoronary papaverine injection [FFRpap]) in 98 lesions from 98 patients. The hyperemia duration was also measured for FFRoccl and FFRpap. The correlation coefficient between FFRoccl, FFR measured by intravenous ATP ( r =0.973; P <0.01), and FFRpap ( r =0.975; P <0.01) showed almost identical values to those obtained for the correlation coefficient between FFR measured by intravenous ATP and FFRpap ( r =0.967; P <0.01). No clear difference was observed on Bland–Altman analysis. Hyperemia duration was significantly longer with FFRoccl than with FFRpap (70±22 versus 51±25 s; P <0.01). Conclusions— Strong correlations were found between FFRoccl and FFR measured by intravenous ATP and FFRoccl and FFRpap. Hyperemia caused by FFRoccl was significantly longer than that caused by FFRpap.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3