Development and Preliminary Validation of a Medicare Claims–Based Model to Predict Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Class in Patients With Heart Failure

Author:

Desai Rishi J.1,Lin Kueiyu Joshua12,Patorno Elisabetta1,Barberio Julie1,Lee Moa1,Levin Raisa1,Evers Thomas3,Wang Shirley V.1,Schneeweiss Sebastian1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (R.J.D., K.J.L., E.P., J.B., M.L., R.L., S.V.W., S.S.).

2. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (K.J.L.).

3. Market Access, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany (T.E.).

Abstract

Background: Ejection fraction (EF) class is an important predictor of treatment response in heart failure (HF); however, administrative claims databases lack information on EF, limiting their usefulness in clinical and health services research of HF. Methods and Results: We linked Medicare claims data to electronic medical records containing EF measurements for a cohort of 11 073 patients with HF from 2 academic medical centers. A a claims-based model predicting EF class was constructed using data from center 1 (“training sample”) and validated using data from center 2 (“testing sample). Linear and logistic regression models with least absolute square shrinkage operator and Bayesian information criteria were developed to select the relevant predictor variables out of the total 57 candidate variables in the training sample. Higher accuracy was noted in the testing sample with models classifying patients into 2 EF classes (reduced EF <0.45) versus preserved EF (≥0.45) when compared with classifying patients into 3 EF classes (reduced, <0.40, moderately reduced, 0.40–0.49, or preserved, ≥0.50). In the testing sample, the most efficient model had 35 predictors and resulted in 83% of patients being correctly classified (95% CI, 82%–84%). The model had positive predictive value of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68–0.78) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83–0.86) and sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.25–0.32) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97–0.98) for reduced and preserved EF, respectively. In addition to HF-specific diagnosis codes, other factors including age, sex, medication use, and comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction and valve disorders, were important discriminators between EF classes. Conclusions: The claims-based model developed in this study may be used to identify patient subgroups with specific EF class in studies evaluating the health outcomes, utilization patterns, and cost, of HF patients in routine care when EF measurements are not available.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3