In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in the United States During and After the Initial Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Surge

Author:

Chan Paul S.12ORCID,Spertus John A.12ORCID,Kennedy Kevin1,Nallamothu Brahmajee K.3ORCID,Starks Monique A.4,Girotra Saket5ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.S.C., J.A.S., K.K.).

2. University of Missouri-Kansas City (P.S.C., J.A.S.).

3. University of Michigan School of Medicine and Ann Arbor V.A. Medical Center (B.K.N.).

4. Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.A.S.).

5. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City (S.G.).

Abstract

Background: Recent reports on challenges in resuscitation care at hospitals severely affected by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raise questions about how the pandemic affected outcomes for in-hospital cardiac arrest throughout the United States. Methods: Within Get With The Guidelines–Resuscitation, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare in-hospital cardiac arrest survival during the presurge (January 1–February 29), surge (March 1–May 15) and immediate postsurge (May 16–June 30) periods in 2020 compared to 2015 to 2019. Monthly COVID-19 mortality rates for each hospital’s county were categorized, per 1 000 000 residents, as low (0–10), moderate (11–50), high (51–100), or very high (>100). Using hierarchical regression models, we compared rates of survival to discharge in 2020 versus 2015 to 2019 for each period. Results: Of 61 586 in-hospital cardiac arrests, 21 208 (4309 in 2020), 26 459 (5949 in 2020), and 13 919 (2686 in 2020) occurred in the presurge, surge, and postsurge periods, respectively. During the presurge period, 24.2% survived to discharge in 2020 versus 24.7% in 2015 to 2019 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.22]). In contrast, during the surge period, 19.6% survived to discharge in 2020 versus 26.0% in 2015 to 2019 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [0.75–0.88]). Lower survival was most pronounced in communities with high (28% lower survival) and very high (42% lower survival) monthly COVID-19 mortality rates (interaction P <0.001). Resuscitation times were shorter (median: 22 versus 25 minutes; P <0.001), and delayed epinephrine treatment was more prevalent (11.3% versus 9.9%; P =0.004) during the surge period. Survival was lower even when patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 infection were excluded from analyses. During the postsurge period, survival rates were similar in 2020 versus 2015 to 2019 (22.3% versus 25.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 [0.83–1.04]), including communities with high COVID-19 mortality (interaction P =0.16). Conclusions: Early during the pandemic, rates of survival to discharge for IHCA decreased, even among patients without COVID-19 infection, highlighting the early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital resuscitation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3