Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Think Tank: Accelerating New Care Models

Author:

Beatty Alexis L.1ORCID,Brown Todd M.2,Corbett Mollie3ORCID,Diersing Dean4,Keteyian Steven J.5,Mola Ana6ORCID,Stolp Haley78ORCID,Wall Hilary K.8ORCID,Sperling Laurence S.89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA (A.L.B.).

2. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (T.M.B.).

3. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Chicago, IL (M.C.).

4. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UMC Health System, Lubbock, TX (D.D.).

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI (S.J.K.).

6. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (A.M.).

7. IHRC, Inc, Atlanta, GA (H.S.).

8. CDC, Atlanta, GA (H.S., H.K.W., L.S.S.).

9. Emory Center for Heart Disease Prevention, Atlanta, GA (L.S.S.).

Abstract

This article describes the October 2020 proceedings of the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Think Tank: Accelerating New Care Models, convened with representatives from professional organizations, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, academic institutions, federal agencies, payers, and patient representative groups. As CR delivery evolves, terminology is evolving to reflect not where activities occur (eg, center, home) but how CR is delivered: in-person synchronous, synchronous with real-time audiovisual communication (virtual), or asynchronous (remote). Patients and CR staff may interact through ≥1 delivery modes. Though new models may change how CR is delivered and who can access CR, new models should not change what is delivered—a multidisciplinary program addressing CR core components. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency, Medicare issued waivers to allow virtual CR; it is unclear whether these waivers will become permanent policy post-public health emergency. Given CR underuse and disparities in delivery, new models must equitably address patient and health system contributors to disparities. Strategies for implementing new CR care models address safety, exercise prescription, monitoring, and education. The available evidence supports the efficacy and safety of new CR care models. Still, additional research should study diverse populations, impact on patient-centered outcomes, effect on long-term outcomes and health care utilization, and implementation in diverse settings. CR is evolving to include in-person synchronous, virtual, and remote modes of delivery; there is significant enthusiasm for implementing new care models and learning how new care models can broaden access to CR, improve patient outcomes, and address health inequities.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3