Characterizing Teamwork in Cardiovascular Care Outcomes

Author:

Carson Matthew B.1,Scholtens Denise M.1,Frailey Conor N.1,Gravenor Stephanie J.1,Powell Emilie S.1,Wang Amy Y.1,Kricke Gayle Shier1,Ahmad Faraz S.1,Mutharasan R. Kannan1,Soulakis Nicholas D.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Preventive Medicine (M.B.C., D.M.S., C.N.F., A.Y.W., G.S.K., F.S.A., N.D.S.), Emergency Medicine (S.J.G., E.S.P.), Family and Community Medicine (A.Y.W.), and Medicine (F.S.A., R.K.M.), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

Abstract

Background— The nature of teamwork in healthcare is complex and interdisciplinary, and provider collaboration based on shared patient encounters is crucial to its success. Characterizing the intensity of working relationships with risk-adjusted patient outcomes supplies insight into provider interactions in a hospital environment. Methods and Results— We extracted 4 years of patient, provider, and activity data for encounters in an inpatient cardiology unit from Northwestern Medicine’s Enterprise Data Warehouse. We then created a provider–patient network to identify healthcare providers who jointly participated in patient encounters and calculated satisfaction rates for provider–provider pairs. We demonstrated the application of a novel parameter, the shared positive outcome ratio, a measure that assesses the strength of a patient-sharing relationship between 2 providers based on risk-adjusted encounter outcomes. We compared an observed collaboration network of 334 providers and 3453 relationships to 1000 networks with shared positive outcome ratio scores based on randomized outcomes and found 188 collaborative relationships between pairs of providers that showed significantly higher than expected patient satisfaction ratings. A group of 22 providers performed exceptionally in terms of patient satisfaction. Our results indicate high variability in collaboration scores across the network and highlight our ability to identify relationships with both higher and lower than expected scores across a set of shared patient encounters. Conclusions— Satisfaction rates seem to vary across different teams of providers. Team collaboration can be quantified using a composite measure of collaboration across provider pairs. Tracking provider pair outcomes over a sufficient set of shared encounters may inform quality improvement strategies such as optimizing team staffing, identifying characteristics and practices of high-performing teams, developing evidence-based team guidelines, and redesigning inpatient care processes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Readmissions Reduction Program. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.html. Accessed August 2015.

2. Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update. 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/coordination/atlas2014/index.html. Accessed August 2015.

3. Multi-professional patterns and methods of communication during patient handoffs

4. Patient Care Teams in treatment of diabetes and chronic heart failure in primary care: an observational networks study

5. Inter-Agency Collaboration in the Care of Children with Complex Chronic Conditions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3