Myocardial Blood Flow by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Coronary Stenosis: Comparison to PET and Invasive Physiology

Author:

Rasmussen Laust Dupont12ORCID,Murphy Theodore3ORCID,Milidonis Xenios4,Eftekhari Ashkan1,Karim Salma Raghad5,Westra Jelmer5,Dahl Jonathan Nørtoft1ORCID,Isaksen Christin6,Brix Lau6ORCID,Ejlersen June Anita7,Nyegaard Mette8ORCID,Johansen Jane Kirk9,Søndergaard Hanne Maare10,Mortensen Jesper11ORCID,Gormsen Lars Christian12ORCID,Christiansen Evald Høj5ORCID,Chiribiri Amedeo4ORCID,Petersen Steffen E.313ORCID,Bøttcher Morten1ORCID,Winther Simon1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology (L.D.R., A.E., J.N.D., M.B., S.W.), Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.

2. Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (L.D.R.).

3. Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (T.M., S.E.P.).

4. Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom (X.M., A.C.).

5. Department of Cardiology (S.R.K., J.W., E.H.C.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

6. Department of Radiology, Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark (C.I., L.B.).

7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Viborg Hospital, Denmark (J.A.E.).

8. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark (M.N.).

9. Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital Central Jutland, Silkeborg, Denmark (J.K.J.).

10. Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital Central Jutland, Viborg, Denmark (H.M.S.).

11. Department of Nuclear Medicine (J.M.), Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.

12. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre (L.C.G.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

13. William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University London, Charterhouse Square, United Kingdom (S.E.P.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recent guideline recommendations, quantitative perfusion (QP) estimates of myocardial blood flow from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have only been sparsely validated. Furthermore, the additional diagnostic value of utilizing QP in addition to the traditional visual expert interpretation of stress-perfusion CMR remains unknown. The aim was to investigate the correlation between myocardial blood flow measurements estimated by CMR, positron emission tomography, and invasive coronary thermodilution. The second aim is to investigate the diagnostic performance of CMR-QP to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Prospectively enrolled symptomatic patients with >50% diameter stenosis on computed tomography angiography underwent dual-bolus CMR and positron emission tomography with rest and adenosine-stress myocardial blood flow measurements. Subsequently, an invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve and thermodilution-based coronary flow reserve was performed. Obstructive CAD was defined as both anatomically severe (>70% diameter stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography) or hemodynamically obstructive (ICA with fractional flow reserve ≤0.80). RESULTS: About 359 patients completed all investigations. Myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements correlated weakly between estimates from CMR-QP, positron emission tomography, and ICA-coronary flow reserve (r<0.40 for all comparisons). In the diagnosis of anatomically severe CAD, the interpretation of CMR-QP by an expert reader improved the sensitivity in comparison to visual analysis alone (82% versus 88% [ P =0.03]) without compromising specificity (77% versus 74% [ P =0.28]). In the diagnosis of hemodynamically obstructive CAD, the accuracy was only moderate for a visual expert read and remained unchanged when additional CMR-QP measurements were interpreted. CONCLUSIONS: CMR-QP correlates weakly to myocardial blood flow measurements by other modalities but improves diagnosis of anatomically severe CAD. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03481712.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3