Comparison of Stress-Rest and Stress-LGE Analysis Strategy in Patients Undergoing Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Author:

Swoboda Peter P.1ORCID,Matthews Gareth D.K.2,Garg Pankaj2ORCID,Plein Sven1ORCID,Greenwood John P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom (P.P.S., S.P., J.P.G.).

2. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, United Kingdom (G.D.K.M., P.G.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance can be performed without rest perfusion for the quantification of ischemia burden. However, the optimal method of analysis is uncertain. METHODS: We identified 666 patients from CE-MARC (Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease) with complete stress perfusion, rest perfusion, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and quantitative coronary angiography data. For each segment of the 16-segment model, perfusion was visually graded during stress and rest imaging, with infarct transmurality assessed from LGE imaging. In the stress-LGE analysis, a segment was defined as ischemic if it had a subendocardial perfusion defect with no infarction. Rest perfusion was not used in this analysis. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of stress-LGE analysis against quantitative coronary angiography and the stress-rest method validated in the original CE-MARC analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of the stress-LGE method was evaluated with different thresholds of infarct transmurality used to define whether an infarcted segment had peri-infarct ischemia. RESULTS: The optimal stress-LGE analysis classified all segments with a stress perfusion defect as ischemic unless they had >75% infarct transmurality (area under the curve, 0.843; sensitivity, 75.6%; specificity, 93.1%; P <0.001). This analysis method has superior diagnostic accuracy to the stress-rest method (area under the curve, 0.834; sensitivity, 73.6%; specificity, 93.1%; P <0.001, P value for difference=0.02). Patients were followed-up for median 6.5 years for major adverse cardiovascular events, with the presence of inducible ischemia by either the stress-LGE or stress-rest analysis being similar and strongly predictive (hazard ratio, 2.65; P <0.001, for both). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of CE-MARC, the optimum definition of inducible ischemia was the presence of a stress-induced perfusion defect without transmural infarction. This definition improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with the stress-rest analysis validated in the original study. The absence of ischemia by either analysis strategy conferred a favorable long-term prognosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dolor torácico: de las guías a la práctica clínica;Radiología;2024-06

2. Cardiovascular imaging research and innovation in 2023;European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice;2024-01

3. Stress-Only CMR Perfusion: Ready for Clinical Application?;Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging;2023-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3