Machine Learning From Quantitative Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Fractional Flow Reserve–Defined Ischemia and Impaired Myocardial Blood Flow

Author:

Lin Andrew1,van Diemen Pepijn A.2,Motwani Manish3,McElhinney Priscilla1,Otaki Yuka4,Han Donghee4,Kwan Alan4ORCID,Tzolos Evangelos45ORCID,Klein Eyal4,Kuronuma Keiichiro4,Grodecki Kajetan1,Shou Benjamin4ORCID,Rios Richard6ORCID,Manral Nipun1ORCID,Cadet Sebastien4ORCID,Danad Ibrahim2,Driessen Roel S.2,Berman Daniel S.4,Nørgaard Bjarne L.7,Slomka Piotr J.6ORCID,Knaapen Paul2,Dey Damini1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute (A.L., P.E., K.G., N.M., D.D.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

2. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.A.v.D., I.D., R.S.D., P.K.).

3. Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (M.M.).

4. Department of Imaging and Medicine and the Smidt Heart Institute (Y.O., D.H., A.K., E.T., E.K., K.K., B.S., S.C., D.S.B.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

5. British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (E.T.).

6. Department of Medicine (R.R., P.J.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

7. Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Denmark (B.L.N.).

Abstract

Background: A pathophysiological interplay exists between plaque morphology and coronary physiology. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for cardiovascular risk stratification. We sought to assess the performance of a ML score integrating CCTA-based quantitative plaque features for predicting vessel-specific ischemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) and impaired myocardial blood flow (MBF) by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial (Prospective Comparison of Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography [CT]‚ Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/CT Perfusion Imaging and CT Coronary Angiography with Invasive Coronary Angiography) included 208 patients with suspected coronary artery disease who prospectively underwent CCTA‚ [ 15 O]H 2 O PET, and invasive FFR. Plaque quantification from CCTA was performed using semiautomated software. An ML algorithm trained on the prospective NXT trial (484 vessels) was used to develop a ML score for the prediction of ischemia (FFR≤0.80), which was then evaluated in 581 vessels from the PACIFIC trial. Thereafter, the ML score was applied for predicting impaired hyperemic MBF (≤2.30 mL/min per g) from corresponding PET scans. The performance of the ML score was compared with CCTA reads and noninvasive FFR derived from CCTA (FFR CT ). Results: One hundred thirty-nine (23.9%) vessels had FFR-defined ischemia, and 195 (33.6%) vessels had impaired hyperemic MBF. For the prediction of FFR-defined ischemia, the ML score yielded an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.92, which was significantly higher than that of visual stenosis grade (0.84; P <0.001) and comparable with that of FFR CT (0.93; P =0.34). Quantitative percent diameter stenosis and low-density noncalcified plaque volume had the greatest ML feature importance for predicting FFR-defined ischemia. When applied for impaired MBF prediction, the ML score exhibited an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.80; significantly higher than visual stenosis grade (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.74; P =0.02) and comparable with FFR CT (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.77; P =0.16). Conclusions: An externally validated ML score integrating CCTA-based quantitative plaque features accurately predicts FFR-defined ischemia and impaired MBF by PET, performing superiorly to standard CCTA stenosis evaluation and comparably to FFR CT .

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3