Delirium Leads to Poor In‐Hospital and 90‐Day Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis or Intraarterial Therapy

Author:

Pan Alan P.1,Agarwal Kathryn2,Taffet George E.2,Jones Stephen L.134,Potter Thomas1,Bako Abdulaziz1,Tannous Jonika1,McCane Charles D.5,Ahmed Wamda O.6,Garg Tanu345,Gadhia Rajan345,Misra Vivek345,Volpi John345,Chiu David345,Vahidy Farhaan S.1478ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Outcomes Research Houston Methodist Houston TX

2. Department of Medicine‐Geriatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX

3. Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY

4. Houston Methodist Academic Institute Houston Methodist Houston TX

5. Department of Neurology Houston Methodist Houston TX

6. Department of Neurology and Neurocritical Care Houston Methodist Sugar Land TX

7. Houston Methodist Neurological Institute Houston Methodist Houston TX

8. Department of Population Health Sciences Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY

Abstract

Background Delirium experienced poststroke is known to be associated with poor prognosis; however, the outcomes and functional consequences among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing intravenous thrombolysis (intravenous tissue plasminogen activator) or intraarterial therapy are not well characterized. Methods Using data from 7 stroke centers with standardized delirium screening protocols, delirium was determined by a positive modified “Arousal, Attention, Abbreviated Mental‐Test, Acute Change Test” or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit screen including diagnosis codes. Multivariable models were fit to estimate likelihoods of in‐hospital mortality, unfavorable discharge disposition, and longer length of stay among delirious patients with AIS, reported as adjusted odds ratios (aORs), adjusted incident rate ratios, and 95% CIs. A subset of patients with AIS with 90‐day modified Rankin scale (mRS) including those receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or intraarterial therapy were analyzed for shifts in mRS scores associated with delirium, via ordinal logistic regression models. Results Between May 2016 and June 2021, AIS was the primary diagnosis in 12 409 hospitalization encounters representing 10 874 unique patients. Delirium was documented in 41.6% of AIS encounters, compared with 26.5% of age and mild cognitive impairment– or dementia‐matched non‐AIS encounters. Delirious (versus nondelirious) patients with AIS were older (median: 75 years versus 65 years), more frequently women (53.3% versus 48.7%), with a higher comorbidity burden (median Charlson Comorbidity Index: 7 versus 5). Delirious patients with AIS had higher odds of in‐hospital mortality (aOR, 2.66; [95% CI, 1.62–4.49]), unfavorable discharge disposition (aOR, 3.68; [95% CI, 3.15–4.30]), and longer length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.67; CI, 1.61–1.73). In the cohort of 2784 patients with treated and untreated AIS with 90‐day mRS, adjusted models indicated lower mRS (aOR, 0.54; CI, 0.46–0.63) associated with treatment, and higher mRS for delirious patients with AIS (aOR, 3.09; CI, 2.58–3.71). Among the subcohort of 948 patients with treated AIS, delirium remained significantly associated with higher mRS (aOR, 2.82; CI, 2.08–3.83). Conclusion Delirium is common among patients with AIS including those receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or undergoing intraarterial therapy and prognosticates poor in‐hospital and 90‐day outcomes. Active screening and management of delirium may lead to improved stroke outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference42 articles.

1. Delirium

2. Delirium in elderly people

3. Delirium in Older Persons

4. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

5. Slooter AJ, Van De Leur RR, Zaal IJ. Delirium in critically ill patients. In: Wijdicks EFM, Kramer AH, eds. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier; 2017:449–466.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3