Tail-cuff blood pressure measurement without external preheating in awake rats.

Author:

Buñag R D,Butterfield J

Abstract

A new photoelectric sensor capable of detecting tail pulses even in unheated rats was tested for accuracy in indirect measurements of blood pressure. This sensor proved more sensitive than a Doppler ultrasonic flowmeter because it allowed detection not only of tail pulsations without preheating but also of peak oscillations usable for estimating mean arterial pressure. After blood pressures in anesthetized rats were elevated with norepinephrine or lowered with sodium nitroprusside, systolic pressures determined with the photoelectric sensor were almost identical with those recorded concurrently from femoral catheters (r = 0.939). Cuff pressure at peak oscillations in the tail correlated better with femoral mean pressure than with femoral diastolic pressure. However, similar comparisons in awake rats with chronically implanted carotid catheters showed that, although correlation between tail-cuff and carotid systolic pressures remained significant (r = 0.962), the correlation between peak tail oscillations and either mean or diastolic pressure was not. When systolic pressures were measured indirectly once a week for 7 weeks in unheated awake rats, normotensive rats could be easily distinguished from streptozotocin-diabetic and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Routine Direct Measurement of Arterial Pressure in Unanesthetized Rats

2. Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the rat as obtained by the use of tail and foot methods, and by direct femoral puncture;Ablondi F;J Lab Clin Med,1947

3. Pressor effects of the tail-cuff method in awake normotensive and hypertensive rats;Buiiag RD;J Lab Clin Med,1971

4. Validation in awake rats of a tail-cuff method for measuring systolic pressure.

5. Buiiag RD McCubbin JW Page IH: Lack of correlation between direct and indirect measurements of arterial pressure in unanesthetized rats. Cardiovasc Res S: 24 1971

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3