Abstract 14957: Comparison of Coronary Tree Detection and Diameter Quantification From a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network With Quantitative Coronary Angiography

Author:

Iyer Kritika1,Najarian Cyrus2,Sankardas Mullasari A3,Subban Vijayakumar3,Nallamothu Brahmajee K4,Figueroa C Alberto A5

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Engineering, Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

2. Univ of Michigan, Northville, MI

3. The Madras Med Mission, Chennai, India

4. UNIVERSITY MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM, Ann Arbor, MI

5. Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Abstract

Introduction: QCA (Quantitative Coronary Angiography) is an accepted standard for assessing coronary artery stenosis severity. QCA computes the percentage diameter reduction of the lesion, improving upon visual inspection since it provides a numerical quantification of stenosis severity. However, it can be costly, and it requires human input to correct the boundaries of the vessel. AngioNet is a fully-automatic deep learning convolutional neural network trained to identify coronary trees and their vessel diameters in angiograms, and could be a cost-effective alternative to QCA. To explore the accuracy of AngioNet, we compared its ability to identify vessels and their diameter when compared with QCA. Methods: Angiograms with 3-vessel QCA reports from 89 patients acquired at Madras Medical Mission were used. The entire vessel tree was segmented for each angiogram using AngioNet. A fast-marching method was used to calculate the radius along the vessel’s centerline. Vessel diameter was compared in two regions corresponding to the regions marked in the QCA report: the most proximal region, containing the maximum vessel diameter, and the region of stenosis. If no stenosis was present, the distal region containing minimum diameter was selected. The difference in maximum and minimum vessel diameter between QCA and AngioNet was computed, and a Bland-Altman plot (see figure) was used to determine the interchangeability of both methods. Results: The mean absolute difference between both measurements was 0.27mm. The standardized difference was 0.215, corresponding to a 91.5% overlap of their distributions. Lastly, 97% of data points were within the limits of agreement, suggesting minimal clinical differences and that both methods may be interchangeable. Conclusions: Deep learning convolutional networks may be used to assess vessel diameters at a level that agrees well with those of QCA. AngioNet has the potential to automate the detection of stenosis severity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3