High‐Intensity Versus Non‐High‐Intensity Statins in Patients Achieving Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Author:

Kim Juwon1,Park Kyu Tae1,Jang Mi Ja1,Park Taek Kyu1,Lee Joo Myung1,Yang Jeong Hoon1,Song Young Bin1,Choi Seung‐Hyuk1,Gwon Hyeon‐Cheol1,Lee Sang‐Hoon1,Hong Kyung Pyo1,Hahn Joo‐Yong1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea

Abstract

Background Whether use of high‐intensity statins is more important than achieving low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL ‐C) target remains controversial in patients with coronary artery disease. We sought to investigate the association between statin intensity and long‐term clinical outcomes in patients achieving treatment target for LDL ‐C after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results Between February 2003 and December 2014, 1746 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and achieved treatment target for LDL ‐C (<70 mg/dL or >50% reduction from baseline level) were studied. We classified patients into 2 groups according to an intensity of statin prescribed after index percutaneous coronary intervention: high‐intensity statin group (atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, and rosuvastatin 20 mg, 372 patients) and non‐high‐intensity statin group (the other statin treatment, 1374 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Difference in time‐averaged LDL ‐C during follow‐up was significant, but small, between the high‐intensity statin group and non‐high‐intensity statin group (59±13 versus 61±12 mg/dL; P =0.04). At 5 years, patients receiving high‐intensity statins had a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome than those treated with non‐high‐intensity statins (4.1% versus 9.9%; hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.79; P <0.01). Results were consistent after propensity‐score matching (4.2% versus 11.2%; hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.69; P <0.01) and across various subgroups. Conclusions Among patients achieving treatment target for LDL ‐C after percutaneous coronary intervention, high‐intensity statins were associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than non‐high‐intensity statins despite a small difference in achieved LDL ‐C level.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3