Risk‐Adjusted Comparison of In‐Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Author:

Stachon Peter1,Kaier Klaus12,Zirlik Andreas13,Bothe Wolfgang4,Heidt Timo1,Zehender Manfred1,Bode Christoph1,von zur Mühlen Constantin1

Affiliation:

1. University Heart Center Freiburg Department of Cardiology and Angiology I Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

2. Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics University Medical Center Freiburg Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

3. Department of Cardiology University Hospital Graz Austria

4. Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Heart Center Freiburg Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Abstract

Background Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF‐TAVR) is recommended for patients suffering from aortic valve stenosis at increased operative risk. Beyond that, patients with different comorbidities could benefit from TF‐TAVR. The present study compares real‐world in‐hospital outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement and TF‐TAVR. Methods and Results For all 33 789 isolated TF‐TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement procedures performed in Germany in 2014 and 2015, comorbidities and in‐hospital outcomes were identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) ‐ and OPS (Operation and procedure key)‐codes. Patients undergoing TF‐TAVR were older and at increased estimated risk. Outcomes were risk‐adjusted to allow comparison. TF‐TAVR was associated with a lower risk for acute kidney injuries (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, P <0.001), for bleeding (OR 0.17, P <0.001), and for prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 hours, OR 0.21, P <0.001). Risk for stroke was similar (OR 1.07, P =0.558). As expected, the risk for pacemaker implantations was higher after TF‐TAVR (OR 4.61, P <0.001). In all patients, none of the treatment strategies had a clear advantage on the risk for in‐hospital mortality (OR 0.83, P =0.068). However, in patients aged >80 years and at high operative risk undergoing TF‐TAVR in‐hospital mortality was lower (TF‐TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement 80–84, OR 0.55; P =0.002; ≥85 years, OR 0.42, P =0.006; EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) >9: OR 0.62, P =0.001). TF‐TAVR was superior in patients with renal failure and in NYHA (New York Heart Association)‐Class III/IV. Other risk groups were not found to be factors favoring a treatment strategy. Conclusions The present study indicates a superiority of TF‐TAVR in clinical practice for patients at increased operative risk, aged >80 years, in NYHA‐Class III/IV, and with renal failure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3