Mild Pulmonary Hypertension Is Associated With Increased Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Kolte Dhaval12,Lakshmanan Suvasini1,Jankowich Matthew D.123,Brittain Evan L.4,Maron Bradley A.56,Choudhary Gaurav12

Affiliation:

1. Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI

2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI

3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA

6. Department of Cardiology Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Boston MA

Abstract

Background Recent studies have demonstrated a continuum in clinical risk related to mean pulmonary artery pressure that begins at >19 mm Hg, which is below the traditional threshold used to define pulmonary hypertension ( PH ) of 25 mm Hg. Because of the implications on patient diagnosis and prognosis, the generalizability and validity of these data need further confirmation. Methods and Results Databases were searched from inception through January 31, 2018, to identify studies comparing all‐cause mortality between patients with mildly elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure near but <25 mm Hg versus the referent group. The meta‐analysis included 15 nonrandomized studies and 16 482 patients (7451 [45.2%] with measured or calculated mean pulmonary artery pressure of 19–24 mm Hg by right heart catheterization [n=6037] and echocardiography [n=1414] [mild PH ]). The mean duration of follow‐up was 5.2 years. Compared with the referent group, mild PH was associated with an increased risk of mortality (risk ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–1.74; P <0.001; I 2 =47%). Secondary analysis using risk‐adjusted time‐to‐event estimates showed a similar result (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.31; P <0.001; I 2 =42%). The findings were consistent between subgroups of right heart catheterization and echocardiography studies ( P interaction >0.05). There was evidence of publication bias; however, this did not influence the risk estimate (Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill adjusted risk ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.56). Conclusions The risk of mortality is increased in patients with mild PH , defined as measured or calculated mean pulmonary artery pressure >19 mm Hg. These data emphasize a need for diagnosing patients with mild PH with consideration to enrollment in PH clinical studies investigating pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to attenuate clinical risk and improve outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 90 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3