Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012

Author:

Granger Christopher B.1,Bates Eric R.2,Jollis James G.1,Antman Elliott M.3,Nichol Graham4,O'Connor Robert E.5,Gregory Tammy6,Roettig Mayme L.1,Peng S. Andrew7,Ellrodt Gray8,Henry Timothy D.9,French William J.10,Jacobs Alice K.11

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC

2. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI

3. Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA

4. University of Washington‐Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care University of Washington Seattle WA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Virginia School of Medicine Charlottesville VA

6. American Heart Association Dallas TX

7. MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX

8. Department of Medicine Berkshire Medical Center Pittsfield MA

9. Cedars‐Sinai Heart Institute Los Angeles CA

10. Department of Medicine Harbor‐University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Torrance CA

11. Department of Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA

Abstract

Background We aimed to determine the change in treatment strategies and times to treatment over the first 5 years of the Mission: Lifeline program. Methods and Results We assessed pre‐ and in‐hospital care and outcomes from 2008 to 2012 for patients with ST ‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction at US hospitals, using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With The Guidelines Registry. In‐hospital adjusted mortality was calculated including and excluding cardiac arrest as a reason for primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay. A total of 147 466 patients from 485 hospitals were analyzed. There was a decrease in the proportion of eligible patients not treated with reperfusion (6.2% versus 3.3%) and treated with fibrinolytic therapy (13.4% versus 7.0%). Median time from symptom onset to first medical contact was unchanged (≈50 minutes). Use of prehospital ECGs increased (45% versus 71%). All major reperfusion times improved: median first medical contact‐to‐device for emergency medical systems transport to percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (93 to 84 minutes), first door‐to‐device for transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (130 to 112 minutes), and door‐in–door‐out at non–percutaneous coronary intervention–capable hospitals (76 to 62 minutes) (all P <0.001 over 5 years). Rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, and overall in‐hospital mortality increased (5.7% to 6.3%). Adjusted mortality excluding patients with known cardiac arrest decreased by 14% at 3 years and 25% at 5 years ( P <0.001). Conclusions Quality of care for patients with ST ‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction improved over time in Mission: Lifeline, including increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster times‐to‐treatment. In‐hospital mortality improved for patients without cardiac arrest but did not appear to improve overall as the number of these high‐risk patients increased.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3