Prognostic Value of Low Flow in Patients With High Transvalvular Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Author:

Maréchaux Sylvestre12,Rusinaru Dan23,Altes Alexandre1,Pasquet Agnès45,Vanoverschelde Jean Louis45,Tribouilloy Christophe23

Affiliation:

1. GCS-Groupement des Hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille (GHICL), Cardiology department and Heart Valve Center, Faculté libre de médecine/Université Catholique de Lille, France (S.M., A.A.).

2. Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Laboratoire MP3CV – EA 7517, Université de Picardie, Amiens, France (S.M., D.R., C.T.).

3. Department of Cardiology, Amiens University Hospital, France (D.R., C.T.).

4. Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (A.P., J.L.V.).

5. Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium (A.P., J.L.V.).

Abstract

Background: Grading of severe (aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 ) aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is based on a classification depending on flow (normal flow versus low flow) and pressure gradient (low gradient versus high gradient). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcome of patients with normal flow high gradient and low flow high gradient severe aortic stenosis (SAS) with no or minimal symptoms. Methods: This multicenter study enrolled 983 consecutive patients (mean age 75±11 years, 459 women) with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic HG (mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg) SAS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Low flow was defined by Doppler echocardiography as a stroke volume index <30 mL/m 2 (n=131) or a stroke volume <55 mL (n=136). The end point was all-cause mortality. Results: During a median follow-up period of 48 (45–52) months, 225 patients (23%) died. The 60–month mortality was higher in low flow high gradient SAS compared with normal flow high gradient SAS (36±5% versus 22±2% and 38±5% versus 21±2% for stroke volume index and stroke volume, respectively, both P <0.0001). After adjustment for outcome predictors including aortic valve replacement as time-dependent covariate, low flow high gradient SAS displayed considerable mortality risk during follow up compared with normal flow high gradient SAS (adjusted HR 2.17 [1.51–3.13]; P <0.0001 for stroke volume index <30 mL/m 2 and adjusted HR 1.86 [1.29–2.68]; P =0.001, for stroke volume <55 mL). The prognostic impact of low flow was consistent in subgroups of patients. Conclusions: Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with low flow high gradient SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction have a considerable increased risk of mortality during follow-up. These patients should be promptly considered for aortic valve replacement.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3