Differences in Myocardial Remodeling and Tissue Characteristics in Chronic Isolated Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation

Author:

Malahfji Maan1ORCID,Kitkungvan Danai12,Senapati Alpana13,Nguyen Duc T.4ORCID,El-Tallawi Carlos1,Tayal Bhupendar1,Debs Dany1,Crudo Valentina1,Graviss Edward A.4ORCID,Reardon Michael J.1ORCID,Quinones Miguel1,Zoghbi William A.1,Shah Dipan J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, TX (M.M., D.K., A.S., C.E.-T., B.T., D.D., V.C., M.J.R., M.Q., W.A.Z., D.J.S.).

2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas McGovern School of Medicine, Houston (D.K.).

3. Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT (A.S.).

4. Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital Research Institute, TX (D.T.N., E.A.G.).

Abstract

Background: The left ventricular hemodynamic load differs between aortic regurgitation (AR) and primary mitral regurgitation (MR). We used cardiac magnetic resonance to compare left ventricular remodeling patterns, systemic forward stroke volume, and tissue characteristics between patients with isolated AR and isolated MR. Methods: We assessed remodeling parameters across the spectrum of regurgitant volume. Left ventricular volumes and mass were compared against normal values for age and sex. We calculated forward stroke volume (planimetered left ventricular stroke volume−regurgitant volume) and derived a cardiac magnetic resonance–based systemic cardiac index. We assessed symptom status according to remodeling patterns. We also evaluated the prevalence of myocardial scarring using late gadolinium enhancement imaging, and the extent of interstitial expansion via extracellular volume fraction. Results: We studied 664 patients (240 AR, 424 primary MR), median age of 60.7 (49.5–69.9) years. AR led to more pronounced increases in ventricular volume and mass compared with MR across the spectrum of regurgitant volume ( P <0.001). In ≥moderate regurgitation, AR patients had a higher prevalence of eccentric hypertrophy (58.3% versus 17.5% in MR; P <0.001), whereas MR patients had normal geometry (56.7%) followed by myocardial thinning with low mass/volume ratio (18.4%). The patterns of eccentric hypertrophy and myocardial thinning were more common in symptomatic AR and MR patients ( P <0.001). Systemic cardiac index remained unchanged across the spectrum of AR, whereas it progressively declined with increasing MR volume. Patients with MR had a higher prevalence of myocardial scarring and higher extracellular volume with increasing regurgitant volume ( P value for trend <0.001), whereas they were unchanged across the spectrum of AR ( P =0.24 and 0.42, respectively). Conclusions: Cardiac magnetic resonance identified significant heterogeneity in remodeling patterns and tissue characteristics at matched degrees of AR and MR. Further research is needed to examine if these differences impact reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after intervention.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3