A New Tool for Automatic Assessment of Segmental Wall Motion Based on Longitudinal 2D Strain

Author:

Liel-Cohen Noah1,Tsadok Yossi1,Beeri Ronen1,Lysyansky Peter1,Agmon Yoram1,Feinberg Micha S.1,Fehske Wolfgang1,Gilon Dan1,Hay Ilan1,Kuperstein Rafael1,Leitman Marina1,Deutsch Lisa1,Rosenmann David1,Sagie Alik1,Shimoni Sarah1,Vaturi Mordehay1,Friedman Zvi1,Blondheim David S.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Soroka University Medical Center (N.L.-C.), Beer Sheva, Israel; Ben-Gurion University (Y.T.), Beer Sheva, Israel; Hadassah University Hospital (R.B., D.G.), Jerusalem, Israel; General Electric Healthcare (P.L., L.D., Z.F.), Haifa, Israel; Rambam Medical Center (Y.A.), Haifa, Israel; Sheba Medical Center (M.S.F., I.H., R.K.), Tel Aviv, Israel; St Vinzenz Hospital (W.F.), Cologne, Germany; Asaff Harofeh Medical Center (M.L.), Zerifin, Israel; Shaare Zedek Medical Center (D.R.), Jerusalem,...

Abstract

Background— Identification and quantification of segmental left ventricular wall motion abnormalities on echocardiograms is of paramount clinical importance but is still performed by a subjective visual method. We constructed an automatic tool for assessment of wall motion based on longitudinal strain. Methods and Results— Echocardiograms of 105 patients (3 apical views) were blindly analyzed by 12 experienced readers. Visual segmental scores (VSS) and peak systolic longitudinal strain were assigned to each of 18 segments per patient. Ranges of peak systolic longitudinal strain that best fit VSS (by receiver operating characteristic analysis) were used to generate automatic segmental scores (ASS). Comparisons of ASS and VSS were performed on 1952 analyzable segments. There was agreement of wall motion scores between both methods in 89.6% of normal, 39.5% of hypokinetic, and 69.4% of akinetic segments. Correlation between methods was r =0.63 ( P <0.0001). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability using interclass correlation for scoring segmental wall motion into 3 scores by ASS was 0.82 and 0.83 and by VSS 0.70 and 0.69, respectively. Compared with VSS (majority rule), ASS had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 87%, 85%, and 86%, respectively. ASS and VSS had similar success rates for correct identification of wall motion abnormalities in territories supplied by culprit arteries. VSS had greater specificity and positive predictive values, whereas ASS had higher sensitivity and negative predictive values for identifying the culprit artery. Conclusions— Automatic quantification of wall motion on echocardiograms by this tool performs as well as visual analysis by experienced echocardiographers, with a greater reliability and similar agreement to angiographic findings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3