Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With and Without Psychiatric Disorders: Differences in Use of Coronary Angiography, Coronary Revascularization, and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator and Survival

Author:

Barcella Carlo Alberto1,Mohr Grimur Høgnason12,Kragholm Kristian Hay345,Gerds Thomas Alexander67,Jensen Svend Eggert38,Polcwiartek Christoffer35,Wissenberg Mads19,Lippert Freddy Knudsen9,Torp‐Pedersen Christian35,Kessing Lars Vedel10,Gislason Gunnar Hilmar17,Søndergaard Kathrine Bach1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte Hellerup Denmark

2. Psychiatric Center Amager Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Cardiology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

4. Department of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

5. Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

6. Department of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Denmark

7. The Danish Heart Foundation Copenhagen Denmark

8. Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

9. Emergency Medical Services The Capital Region of Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

10. Psychiatric Center Copenhagen Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

Background Healthcare disparities for psychiatric patients are common. Whether these inequalities apply to postresuscitation management in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest ( OHCA ) is unknown. We investigated differences in in‐hospital cardiovascular procedures following OHCA between patients with and without psychiatric disorders. Methods and Results Using the Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients admitted to the hospital following OHCA of presumed cardiac cause (2001‐2015). Psychiatric disorders were identified using hospital diagnoses or redeemed prescriptions for psychotropic drugs. We calculated age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence rates and incidence rate ratios ( IRR s) of cardiovascular procedures during post‐ OHCA admission in patients with and without psychiatric disorders. Differences in 30‐day and 1‐year survival were assessed by multivariable logistic regression in the overall population and among 2‐day survivors who received acute coronary angiography ( CAG ). We included 7288 hospitalized patients who had experienced an OHCA: 1661 (22.8%) had a psychiatric disorder. Compared with patients without psychiatric disorders, patients with psychiatric disorders had lower standardized incidence rates for acute CAG (≤1 day post‐ OHCA ) ( IRR , 0.51; 95% CI, 0.45–0.57), subacute CAG (2–30 days post‐ OHCA ) ( IRR , 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30–0.52), and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implantation ( IRR , 0.67; 95% CI , 0.48–0.95). Conversely, we did not detect differences in coronary revascularization among patients undergoing CAG ( IRR , 1.11; 95% CI , 0.94–1.30). Patients with psychiatric disorders had lower survival even among 2‐day survivors who received acute CAG: (odds ratio of 30‐day survival, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.91; and 1‐year survival, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.88). Conclusions Psychiatric patients had a lower probability of receiving post‐ OHCA CAG and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator implantation compared with nonpsychiatric patients but the same probability of coronary revascularization among patients undergoing CAG. However, their survival was lower irrespective of angiographic procedures.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3