Affiliation:
1. Mount Sinai Heart The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, and The Marie‐Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY
2. Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Heart Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
Abstract
Background
The
PROTECT
‐
AF
(Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and
PREVAIL
(Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) trials demonstrated noninferiority of left atrial appendage closure (
LAAC
) to warfarin for the composite end point of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death. This study aims to quantify the net clinical benefit (
NCB
) of
LAAC
versus warfarin, accounting for differences in clinical impact of different event types.
Methods and Results
We performed a post hoc analysis of the
PROTECT
‐
AF
and
PREVAIL
trials, which randomized atrial fibrillation patients to
LAAC
or warfarin in a 2:1 fashion. The trials enrolled patients in the United States and Europe between 2005 and 2012 with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation and
CHADS
2
risk scores ≥1. Relative to an index weight for death (1.0), events were assigned weights based on their disabling effect: (1) stroke event weights were based on modified Rankin scores in the base case analyses, and (2) major bleed (0.05) and pericardial effusion (0.05).
NCB
was calculated as the sum of weight‐adjusted events per 100 patient‐years. Among 1114 randomized subjects, the
NCB
of
LAAC
was 1.42% per year (95%
CI
0.01–2.82,
P
=0.04) and a relative risk of 0.74 (95%
CI
0.56–1.00).
NCB
point estimates favored warfarin early in follow‐up, but trended in favor of
LAAC
after 1 to 2 years. The benefit of
LAAC
was preserved across subgroups, with particular benefit observed in the subgroup of prior stroke and without diabetes mellitus.
Conclusions
This analysis demonstrates long‐term
NCB
of
LAAC
with Watchman over warfarin therapy, as the upfront risk of periprocedural events is counterbalanced over time by reduced bleeding events and mortality.
Clinical Trial Registration
UR
:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifiers:
NCT
01182441 and
NCT
00129545.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献