Use of Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging‐Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI‐ASPECTS) and Ischemic Core Volume to Determine the Malignant Profile in Acute Stroke

Author:

Yoshimoto Takeshi1,Inoue Manabu23,Yamagami Hiroshi3,Fujita Kyohei2,Tanaka Kanta3,Ando Daisuke2,Sonoda Kazutaka3,Kamogawa Naruhiko2,Koga Masatoshi2,Ihara Masafumi1,Toyoda Kazunori2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

2. Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

3. Division of Stroke Care Unit National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan

Abstract

Background Malignant profiles were identified by imaging profiles and unfavorable outcomes that have poor response to reperfusion therapy. Many trials have used this profile in their inclusion criteria including large‐vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke trials. We aimed to redefine the cutoff values for malignant profile in acute ischemic stroke patients with large‐vessel occlusion regardless of reperfusion therapy. Methods and Results Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior large‐vessel occlusion were prospectively extracted from the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Stroke Registry between March 2014 and December 2017. Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging‐Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI‐ASPECTS) and diffusion‐weighted imaging lesion ischemic core volume (Vol DWI ) were measured in acute ischemic stroke patients with large‐vessel occlusion with or without treatment. Unfavorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 5 to 6 at 3 months, and optimal DWIASPECTS and Vol DWI for unfavorable outcome were assessed. In total, 198 patients (111 men, 77±13 years old) were enrolled. Median DWIASPECTS was 7 (5‐9), and median Vol DWI was 55 (6‐134) mL . Among the patients, 72 (36%) patients underwent reperfusion therapy, and 83 (42%) had unfavorable outcomes. The threshold values for a malignant profile on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for DWIASPECTS and Vol DWI were 4 (area under the curve 0.78, P <0.01; sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.75) and 71 mL (area under the curve 0.80, P <0.01; sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.77), respectively. Conclusions The cutoff values for our redefined malignant profile were DWIASPECTS 4 and Vol DWI 71 mL with no selection bias for reperfusion therapy in the real‐world clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT 02251665

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3