Residual Ischemia After Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Author:

Arnold Jayanth R.1,Karamitsos Theodoros D.1,van Gaal William J.1,Testa Luca1,Francis Jane M.1,Bhamra-Ariza Paul1,Ali Ali1,Selvanayagam Joseph B.1,Westaby Steve1,Sayeed Rana1,Jerosch-Herold Michael1,Neubauer Stefan1,Banning Adrian P.1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.R.A., T.D.K., J.M.F., P.B.-A., A.A., J.B.S., S.N.), Department of Cardiology (W.J.v.G., L.T., A.P.B.), and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.W., R.S.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; and Brigham & Women’s Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.J.-H.).

Abstract

Background— Revascularization strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease include percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. In this study, we compared the completeness of revascularization as assessed by coronary angiography and by quantitative serial perfusion imaging using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Methods and Results— Patients with multivessel coronary disease were recruited into a randomized trial of treatment with either coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiographic disease burden was determined by the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) myocardial jeopardy index. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging was performed before and 5 to 6 months after revascularization. Using model-independent deconvolution, hyperemic myocardial blood flow was evaluated, and ischemic burden was quantified. Sixty-seven patients completed follow-up (33 coronary artery bypass grafting and 34 percutaneous coronary intervention). The myocardial jeopardy index was 80.7±15.2% at baseline and 6.9±11.3% after revascularization ( P <0.0001), with revascularization deemed complete in 62.7% of patients. Relative to cardiovascular magnetic resonance, angiographic assessment overestimated disease burden at baseline (80.7±15.2% versus 49.9±29.2% [ P <0.0001]), but underestimated it postprocedure (6.9±11.3% versus 28.1±33.4% [ P <0.0001]). Fewer patients achieved complete revascularization based on functional criteria than on angiographic assessment (38.8% versus 62.7%; P =0.015). After revascularization, hyperemic myocardial blood flow was significantly higher in segments supplied by arterial bypass grafts than those supplied by venous grafts (2.04±0.82 mL/min per gram versus 1.89±0.81 mL/min per gram, respectively; P =0.04). Conclusions— Angiographic assessment may overestimate disease burden before revascularization, and underestimate residual ischemia after revascularization. Functional data demonstrate that a significant burden of ischemia remains even after angiographically defined successful revascularization. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com . Unique identifier:ISRCTN25699844.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3