Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation During Coronary Angiography on Management Strategy and Clinical Outcome

Author:

Baptista Sergio Bravo1,Raposo Luís1,Santos Lino1,Ramos Ruben1,Calé Rita1,Jorge Elisabete1,Machado Carina1,Costa Marco1,Infante de Oliveira Eduardo1,Costa João1,Pipa João1,Fonseca Nuno1,Guardado Jorge1,Silva Bruno1,Sousa Maria-João1,Silva João Carlos1,Rodrigues Alberto1,Seca Luís1,Fernandes Renato1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cardiology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal (S.B.B.); Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa Cruz, CHLO, Carnaxide, Portugal (L.R.); Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal (L.S.); Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Portugal (R.R.); Cardiology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal (R.C.); Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal (E...

Abstract

Background— Penetration of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in clinical practice varies extensively, and the applicability of results from randomized trials is understudied. We describe the extent to which the information gained from routine FFR affects patient management strategy and clinical outcome. Methods and Results— Nonselected patients undergoing coronary angiography, in which at least 1 lesion was interrogated by FFR, were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry. FFR-driven change in management strategy (medical therapy, revascularization, or additional stress imaging) was assessed per-lesion and per-patient, and the agreement between final and initial strategies was recorded. Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization (MACE) at 1 year was recorded. A total of 1293 lesions were evaluated in 918 patients (mean FFR, 0.81±0.1). Management plan changed in 406 patients (44.2%) and 584 lesions (45.2%). One-year MACE was 6.9%; patients in whom all lesions were deferred had a lower MACE rate (5.3%) than those with at least 1 lesion revascularized (7.3%) or left untreated despite FFR≤0.80 (13.6%; log-rank P =0.014). At the lesion level, deferral of those with an FFR≤0.80 was associated with a 3.1-fold increase in the hazard of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/target lesion revascularization ( P =0.012). Independent predictors of target lesion revascularization in the deferred lesions were proximal location of the lesion, B2/C type and FFR. Conclusions— Routine FFR assessment of coronary lesions safely changes management strategy in almost half of the cases. Also, it accurately identifies patients and lesions with a low likelihood of events, in which revascularization can be safely deferred, as opposed to those at high risk when ischemic lesions are left untreated, thus confirming results from randomized trials. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01835808.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3