Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions

Author:

Laird John A.1,Schneider Peter A.2,Jaff Michael R.3,Brodmann Marianne4,Zeller Thomas5,Metzger D. Chris6,Krishnan Prakash7,Scheinert Dierk8,Micari Antonio9,Wang Hong10,Masters Michele10,Tepe Gunnar11

Affiliation:

1. Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena, CA (J.A.L.).

2. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.).

3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.R.J.).

4. Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.).

5. Universitaets-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.).

6. Ballad Health Systems CVA Heart & Vascular Institute, Kingsport, TN (D.C.M.).

7. The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (P.K.).

8. University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.).

9. Gavazzeni Hospital Humanitas, Bergamo, Italy (A.M.).

10. Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.M.).

11. Ro Med Clinic Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.).

Abstract

Background: While randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. Methods and Results: IN.PACT SFA is a prospective, multicenter, randomized single-blinded trial (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Catheter vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA]) that enrolled 331 subjects with symptomatic (Rutherford 2–4) femoropopliteal lesions. Subjects were randomly assigned 2:1 to the IN.PACT Admiral DCB or PTA. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, the primary safety end point, and major adverse events. Through 5 years, patients treated with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrated a sustained treatment effect with superior freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization when compared with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate of 74.5% versus 65.3%; log-rank P =0.020). The primary safety composite was achieved in 70.7% of subjects in the DCB and 59.6% in the PTA groups ( P =0.068). The major adverse event rate was 42.9% for DCB and 48.1% for PTA ( P =0.459). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group as adjudicated by an independent and blinded Clinical Events Committee. Conclusions: The IN.PACT SFA randomized trial demonstrates that the IN.PACT Admiral DCB continues to perform better than PTA through 5 years with higher freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The sustained safety and effectiveness profile of this DCB supports its use as a preferred treatment choice compared with PTA for femoropopliteal lesions. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01175850 (IN.PACT SFA phase I) and NCT01566461 (IN.PACT SFA phase II).

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 129 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3