Interventional Therapy of Bifurcation Lesions

Author:

Korn Hubertus v.1,Yu Jiangtao1,Ohlow Marc A.1,Huegl Burkhard1,Schulte Walter1,Wagner Andreas1,Wassmer Gernot1,Gruene Stefan1,Petek Oliver1,Lauer Bernward1

Affiliation:

1. From the Krankenhaus Hetzelstift, Clinic of Cardiology (H.v.K., S.G., O.P.), Neustadt an der Weinstrasse, Germany; Department of Cardiology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka (J.Y., M.A.O., B.H., W.S., A.W., B.L.), Bad Berka, Germany; and Institut für Medizinische Statistik (G.W.), Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany.

Abstract

Background— Treatment of bifurcations is a complex problem. The clinical value of treating side branches is an unsolved problem in the field of interventional cardiology. Methods and Results— We initiated a prospective randomized controlled trial. One hundred and ten patients with bifurcations were randomly assigned to 2 arms: Stenting of the main branch (MB, Taxus-stent, paclitaxel-eluting stents) and mandatory side branch (SB) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; kissing balloons) with provisional SB stenting (therapy A), or stenting of the MB (paclitaxel-eluting stents) with provisional SB-PCI only when the SB had a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <2 (therapy B). The primary end point was target lesion revascularization. The mean ages were 66.8 years (A) versus 65.1 years (B, P =0.4), 71.4% (A) versus 77.8% were men ( P =0.4), patients with diabetes were present in 25.0% versus 25.9% ( P =0.9). The MB was left anterior descending artery in 80.4% versus 81.5% (A versus B, P =0.9). The SB-PCI and kissing balloon-PCI were performed according to the study protocol in 82.1%/73.2% versus 16.7%/13.0% ( P <0.05 for both), while changing of the intended therapy was necessary in 17.9% versus 16.7% (A versus B, P =0.9). A final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 (MB) was reached in all patients (groups A and B), final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 (SB) was observed in 96.4% versus 88.9% (A versus B, P =0.3). Radiation time (min) and contrast medium (mL) were 14.2/210 (group A) versus 7.8/151.6 (group B; P for both <0.05). Six month – follow up: major adverse cardiac events was 23.2% (A) versus 24.1% (B, P =0.9), target lesion revascularization was 17.9% (A) versus 14.8% (B, P =0.7), and late lumen loss (MB) was 0.2 mm (A) versus 0.3 mm (B, P =0.5). In group B, no PCI of the SB was done during follow up. Conclusion— A simple strategy using paclitaxel-eluting stents with only provisional SB-PCI may be of equal value to a more complex strategy with mandatory SB-PCI. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.controlled.trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN22637771.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3