Change in Coronary Blood Flow After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Relation to Baseline Lesion Physiology

Author:

Nijjer Sukhjinder S.1,Petraco Ricardo1,van de Hoef Tim P.1,Sen Sayan1,van Lavieren Martijn A.1,Foale Rodney A.1,Meuwissen Martijn1,Broyd Christopher1,Echavarria-Pinto Mauro1,Al-Lamee Rasha1,Foin Nicolas1,Sethi Amarjit1,Malik Iqbal S.1,Mikhail Ghada W.1,Hughes Alun D.1,Mayet Jamil1,Francis Darrel P.1,Di Mario Carlo1,Escaned Javier1,Piek Jan J.1,Davies Justin E.1

Affiliation:

1. From the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (S.S.N., R.P., S.S., R.A.F., C.B., R.A.-L., N.F., A.S., I.S.M., G.W.M., A.D.H., J.M., D.P.F., C.D.M., J.E.D.); AMC Heart Centre, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (T.P.v.d.H., M.A.v.L., J.J.P.); Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.E.-P., J.E.); Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands (M.M.); and Cardiovascular National Institute...

Abstract

Background— Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aims to increase coronary blood flow by relieving epicardial obstruction. However, no study has objectively confirmed this and assessed changes in flow over different phases of the cardiac cycle. We quantified the change in resting and hyperemic flow velocity after PCI in stenoses defined physiologically by fractional flow reserve and other parameters. Methods and Results— Seventy-five stenoses (67 patients) underwent paired flow velocity assessment before and after PCI. Flow velocity was measured over the whole cardiac cycle and the wave-free period. Mean fractional flow reserve was 0.68±0.02. Pre-PCI, hyperemic flow velocity is diminished in stenoses classed as physiologically significant compared with those classed nonsignificant ( P <0.001). In significant stenoses, flow velocity over the resting wave-free period and hyperemic flow velocity did not differ statistically. After PCI, resting flow velocity over the wave-free period increased little (5.6±1.6 cm/s) and significantly less than hyperemic flow velocity (21.2±3 cm/s; P <0.01). The greatest increase in hyperemic flow velocity was observed when treating stenoses below physiological cut points; treating stenoses with fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 gained Δ28.5±3.8 cm/s, whereas those fractional flow reserve >0.80 had a significantly smaller gain (Δ4.6±2.3 cm/s; P <0.001). The change in pressure-only physiological indices demonstrated a curvilinear relationship to the change in hyperemic flow velocity but was flat for resting flow velocity. Conclusions— Pre-PCI physiology is strongly associated with post-PCI increase in hyperemic coronary flow velocity. Hyperemic flow velocity increases 6-fold more when stenoses classed as physiologically significant undergo PCI than when nonsignificant stenoses are treated. Resting flow velocity measured over the wave-free period changes at least 4-fold less than hyperemic flow velocity after PCI.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3