Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation After MitraClip: Predictive Factors, Morphology, and Clinical Implication

Author:

Sugiura Atsushi1ORCID,Kavsur Refik1ORCID,Spieker Maximilian2,Iliadis Christos3ORCID,Goto Tadahiro4,Öztürk Can1ORCID,Weber Marcel1,Tabata Noriaki5,Zimmer Sebastian1,Sinning Jan-Malte6,Mauri Victor3,Horn Patrick2,Kelm Malte2ORCID,Baldus Stephan3,Nickenig Georg1,Westenfeld Ralf2,Pfister Roman3,Becher Marc Ulrich1

Affiliation:

1. Heart Center Bonn, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Germany (A.S., R.K., C.O., M.W., S.Z., G.N., M.U.B.).

2. Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S., P.H., M.K., R.W.).

3. Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany (C.I., V.M., S.B., R.P.).

4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Japan (T.G.).

5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan (N.T.).

6. Department of Cardiology, St Vinzenz-Hospital Cologne, Germany (J.-M.S.).

Abstract

Background: Recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) following MitraClip has not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to examine the predictive factors, morphology, and long-term outcome of recurrent MR after MitraClip. Methods: We assessed data from the Heart Failure Network Rhineland registry from August 2010 to October 2018. Competing risk analyses were performed using the Fine and Gray model to assess the risk of recurrent MR. Results: Among 685 MitraClip patients with a reduction in MR to ≤2+, 61 patients developed recurrent MR within the first 12 months. Flail leaflet (hazard ratio, 3.68; P =0.002) and residual MR (MR grade 2+ versus ≤1+: hazard ratio, 2.56; P =0.03) were the predictors of recurrent MR in primary MR patients, while left atrial volume (per 10 mL increase: hazard ratio, 1.11; P <0.001) and residual MR (hazard ratio, 2.45; P =0.01) were independently associated with recurrent MR in secondary MR patients. In primary MR patients, loss of leaflet insertion or leaflet tear were the predominant morphologies with recurrent MR. In secondary MR patients, more than half of the patients with recurrent MR did not show any disorder of the clip or leaflets. Patients with recurrent MR were more likely to experience unplanned heart failure hospitalization or heart failure symptom with New York Heart Association scale III/IV (54.1% versus 37.8%; P =0.018) and undergo a repeat mitral valve intervention (9.8% versus 2.2%; P =0.005) during the follow-up. In the landmark survival analysis, patients with recurrent MR tended to have lower long-term survival (58.7% versus 83.9%; P =0.08) than patients without recurrent MR. Conclusions: Flail leaflet and residual MR were the predictors of recurrent MR in primary MR patients, while a larger left atrial volume and residual MR were associated with recurrent MR in secondary MR patients, which may be associated with long-term clinical outcomes of patients after MitraClip.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3