Long-Term Outcomes Following Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis (DEB-Dragon-Registry)

Author:

Wańha Wojciech1ORCID,Bil Jacek2ORCID,Januszek Rafał34ORCID,Gilis-Malinowska Natasza5ORCID,Figatowski Tomasz5ORCID,Milewski Marek1ORCID,Pawlik Artur3,Staszczak Bartłomiej3,Wybraniec Maciej6ORCID,Tomasiewicz Brunon7ORCID,Kübler Piotr7ORCID,Kuliczkowski Wiktor7ORCID,Walczak Tomasz8ORCID,Hrymniak Bruno8ORCID,Desperak Piotr9ORCID,Mielczarek Maksymilian5,Ciecwierz Dariusz5,Niezgoda Piotr10,Wolny Rafał11ORCID,Chudzik Magdalena12,Kuźma Łukasz13ORCID,Kralisz Paweł13,Kedhi Elvin114,D’Ascenzo Fabrizio15,Hudziak Damian16ORCID,Kowalówka Adam16ORCID,Smolka Grzegorz1,Reczuch Krzysztof7ORCID,Gruchała Marcin5ORCID,Kubica Jacek10,Gil Robert J.2ORCID,Dobrzycki Sławomir13,Dudek Dariusz3,Bartuś Stanisław3ORCID,Gąsior Mariusz9,Ochała Andrzej1,Witkowski Adam11ORCID,Jaguszewski Miłosz5,Wojakowski Wojciech1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (W. Wańha, M. Milewski, E.K., G.S., A.O., W. Wojakowski).

2. Department of Invasive Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland (J.B., R.J.G.).

3. Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland (R.J., A.P., B.S., D.D., S.B.).

4. Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland (R.J.).

5. First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland (N.G.-M., T.F., M. Mielczarek, D.C., M. Gruchała, M.J.).

6. First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Poland (M.W.).

7. Centre for Heart Disease, University Hospital Wroclaw Department of Heart Disease, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (B.T., P.K., W.K., K.R.).

8. Department of Cardiology, 4th Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland (T.W., B.H.).

9. Third Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland (P.D., M. Gąsior).

10. Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland (P.N., J.K.).

11. Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland (R.W., A.W.).

12. Medical University of Warsaw, Poland (M.C.).

13. Department of Invasive Cardiology, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland (L.K., P.K., S.D.).

14. AZ Sint Jan Brugge, Belgium (E.K.).

15. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Italy (F.D.).

16. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (D.H., A.K.).

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the use of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting balloons (DEB) versus thin-strut drug-eluting stents (thin-DES) for treating DES in-stent restenosis in everyday clinical practice is scarce. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of DEB versus thin-DES in DES in-stent restenosis. Methods: Consecutive patients with DES in-stent restenosis who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 2008 and 2019 entered the multicenter DEB-DRAGON Registry with a follow-up of 3 years. Patients who received DEB at the index procedure (n=557, 49.9%) were compared with those who received thin-DES (n=560, 50.1%). Results: Analysis of the unmatched cohort revealed lower rates of target lesion revascularization (9.1% versus 13.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.41–0.83], P =0.003), target vessel revascularization (11.8% versus 16.7%; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45–0.84], P =0.003) and device-oriented composite end point, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel myocardial infarction (12.7% versus 16.0%; HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50–0.94], P =0.018) in the thin-DES group compared with the DEB group. The incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction, and myocardial infarction were similar in both groups. However, after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in target lesion revascularization (11.2% versus 11.2%; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.55–1.51], P =0.707), target vessel revascularization (13.4% versus 14.2%; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.55–1.36], P =0.523), and device-oriented composite end point (14.2% versus 14.2%; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.58–1.42], P =0.667) between the thin-DES and DEB group, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis of a real-life registry revealed similar long-term outcomes of thin-DES and DEB in DES in-stent restenosis regarding target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and device-oriented composite end point. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04415216.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3